Transport to faith schools

Transport to faith schools

Transport to faith schools

Discrimination on grounds of religion and belief is prominent in the provision of both discretionary and statutory home to school transport. We seek equitable school transport policies, free from religious privilege, fair to all families and fair to taxpayers.

Related news

NSS backs more inclusive faith school admissions in Suffolk

NSS backs more inclusive faith school admissions in Suffolk

Posted: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 14:27

The National Secular Society has supported plans to end discriminatory admissions policies for some faith schools in Suffolk.

The NSS said it "strongly" welcomes Suffolk County Council's proposals to remove oversubscription criteria for voluntary controlled (VC) Church of England schools that prioritise Anglican families.

The council launched a consultation on the proposals in October. If approved, they would apply to the 2023/24 academic year intake onwards.

Unlike other types of faith schools, admissions at VC schools are managed by the local authority rather than the school itself. It is rare for local authorities to apply faith-based selection for VC schools.

The current admissions arrangements give priority to children whose families "have been practising members of the Church of England (or other church within the Worldwide Anglican Communion)" for a minimum period of one year before the school application closing date.

The proposal to remove this priority was made in response to concerns raised about equality and inclusion.

In the summer term of 2020, at the request of the St Edmundsbury and Ipswich Diocesan Board of Education, the council adjusted the admissions arrangements for the 2021/2022 school year so that families who were unable to attend church due to COVID-19 restrictions could still be given priority for school places.

To retain this arrangement, the council had to launch a consultation for the 2022/2024 school year. In response, fifteen parents or carers expressed concerns "in terms of equalities and inclusion" about the prioritisation of Anglican families.

This led to the council and the diocese to review these criteria and consult for the 2023/2024 school year.

NSS response

In its response to the consultation, the NSS said religiously selective admissions criteria "send a message that legitimises discrimination and can give the impression that religious adherence is required to attend the school."

It highlighted that 31% of pupils in Suffolk face high or extreme restrictions on the choice of a non-faith primary school, and that in September 2021, 122 pupils were assigned places at faith schools against family preferences for a non-faith school.

It said removing barriers to entry for pupils of all backgrounds would increase all families' access to suitable local schools.

The policy will not affect the 66 voluntary aided and academy faith schools in Suffolk where the council is not the admissions authority, many of which may have faith selective admissions.

The NSS said that it hopes the change "acts as a catalyst" for the council to encourage these schools to end discriminatory oversubscription criteria.

NSS head of education Alastair Lichten said: "By ending discriminatory admissions in schools where they are the admissions authority, Suffolk County Council sends an important message.

"We are glad to see the Diocese of St Edmundsbury and Ipswich supporting these changes. Diocesan rhetoric concerning a move away from faith-based selection is far too rarely reflected in tangible actions."

The consultation closes on 12 November. More information is available on the Suffolk County Council website.

Discuss on Facebook

Image: Juice Verve, Shutterstock.

DfE doesn’t know how many schools have discriminatory admissions

DfE doesn’t know how many schools have discriminatory admissions

Posted: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 13:09

The government has admitted it does not know how many schools apply religious discrimination in their admissions.

The Department for Education has said it "does not hold information on which schools select on the basis of religion as an element of their admissions criteria", in response to a freedom of information request from the National Secular Society.

Exemptions in the Equality Act 2010 enable some kinds of faith schools to prioritise children from particular religious backgrounds if they are oversubscribed.

The DfE has also refused to record which schools practice faith-based selection on their public data service, after the NSS urged the new schools' minister to provide transparency over school admissions.

Currently the Get Information About Schools (GIAS) service, which provides data on all schools in England, only records whether a school is academically selective. The NSS has warned this could be confusing for parents, as hundreds of schools that can select all their pupils based on faith list their admissions policy as "non-selective".

The NSS has previously warned that use of the term "non-selective" can be potentially misleading, particularly in proposals for new religiously selective schools.

NSS head of education Alastair Lichten said: "If religious groups are given exemptions from equality laws to facilitate discrimination on grounds of religion or belief, then there needs to be transparency around that. If the DfE do not and will not record which schools discriminate on this basis, and to what extent, transparency and scrutiny is impossible.

"Are they trying to spare the blushes of faith school groups who know discriminatory admissions are unpopular and morally bankrupt?

"It's long past time we ended faith-based selection. No publicly funded school should be able to discriminate against children based on their parents' beliefs."

Explaining their decision not to record religiously selective admissions, a spokesperson from the DfE told the NSS this would "constitute an additional burden for schools designated with a religious character".

The DfE also said such transparency isn't necessary because local authorities are required to provide a composite admissions prospectus, which explains the admissions policies for all schools in the area.

However, such prospectuses are inconsistent, and it can often be difficult to understand faith schools' selection criteria from the prospectus. The NSS's request would have seen a simple indication of either whether a school has religiously selective oversubscription criteria, or the number of places subject to such criteria.

How many schools have religiously discriminatory admissions?

Although the DfE does not hold data on school admissions policies, various estimates have been made of these figures. One method is to look at the numbers of different school types. The latest NSS analysis has found that in England there are:

  • 2,639 voluntary aided faith schools, which may be able to religiously select up to 100% of their pupils.
  • 105 faith based free schools, which may be able to religiously select up to 50% of their pupils.
  • 1,624 voluntary controlled faith schools, which can only rarely religiously select pupils with the agreement of their local education authority.
  • 1,952 faith-based converter academies and 490 other faith schools, which may be able to religiously select pupils, though the level of religious selection would depend on many factors including their predecessor school.

Discuss on Facebook

Image: Ben Molyneux, Shutterstock

Why is the Catholic church allowed to hinder secondary school choice?

Why is the Catholic church allowed to hinder secondary school choice?

Posted: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 11:33

A case in Leicestershire shows the mess faith groups make of admissions and why secular accountability is necessary, argues Alastair Lichten.

The practice of state funded faith schools discriminating in favour of prospective pupils on the basis of their parents' religion is well known. 'On your knees, avoid the fees' has become common parlance in conversations about religiously selective state schools. But the ways in which faith schools undermine families' choices can be more diverse, complex, and occasionally counterintuitive.

The problem of families being pushed into a faith school, because of a lack of options or faith groups' influence over other education decisions, is less visible. A case in Leicestershire, now the subject of a legal challenge, provides one such example.

Parents at St Thomas More, a Catholic primary school in Leicester, claim the Catholic Diocese of Nottingham which runs the school is fostering discrimination by impeding a meaningful choice of secondary school. The diocese is blocking local non-faith (community-ethos) schools from listing St Thomas More as a feeder. This leaves parents at the school with almost no options but St Paul's Catholic School, a secondary school run by the diocese's trust.

Another community-ethos academy affected by the diocese's meddling is Beauchamp College. When they consulted on listing St Thomas More as a feeder, the diocese wrote to all parents, in a tone described as "intimidating", criticising support for the plan. In 2020, 45 St Thomas More parents called for the move, followed by 60% of consultation respondents. However, the diocese remained adamant that St Thomas More pupils are expected to transfer to St Paul's.

The head of the diocese's academy trust Neil Locker said neither they, nor the bishop, would allow any Catholic school to associate as a feeder with any non-Catholic school, because the relationship between primary and secondary schools "is fundamental and sacrosanct".

Another community ethos secondary school affected is Manor High School. When this school consulted local primary schools on its plans to update its feeder schools, St Thomas More's academy trust decided not to inform parents, in a possible breach of the School Admissions Code.

St Thomas More parents have been fighting for years to be given an equal choice of secondary schools. They describe the decision not to designate the school as a feeder for Manor High School as "a complete surprise and shock".

Frustrated by the diocese's influence over school choice, one parent is taking legal action with the Office of Schools Adjudicator (OSA), a body which helps to clarify the legal position on admissions policies, seeking to challenge the decision of the non-faith secondary schools not to list St Thomas More as a feeder.

The parent leading the legal action said: "I am doing this because many parents were unaware that they were being implicitly tied into a rigid sort of 'contract of Catholic faith education' that, effectively, means parents forgo their choice of non-Catholic secondary schools.

"This was not an informed decision for a substantial number of parents. Being locked into a consumer or employment contract with no exit strategy would never be accepted in any other area of society."

NSS research shows 260 pupils across Leicester and Leicestershire were assigned faith schools against parental preferences this year. Thirty-six per cent of pupils in the county have little choice but a faith-based primary, and the diocese's policy will leave many with little choice but a faith-based secondary school.

A representative of the Doyle Clayton legal firm supporting the case said, if successful, it "will help to ensure that children's secondary school choices are not restricted by the faith of their primary school and by a 'feeder school' system that funnels children into faith schools."

"By operating in this manner, the current system is limiting parents' choices of non-faith 'good' schools in their area, ultimately forcing a Catholic education onto children due to a lack of choice for their parents."

Designating a faith school, as a feeder to a community-ethos school is not straightforward. If this creates an advantage for the faith school pupils, it may risk indirect discrimination. However, in this case all the other local primary schools have been listed by both Manor High School and Beauchamp College. Only St Thomas More is being treated differently, and only at the diocese's behest.

But whatever the arguments for or against specific feeder arrangements, they should not be a matter for the diocese to decide.

The case also raises questions about academisation, and the decreased role of local authorities in admissions. Our research shows that half of former community schools now in multi-academy trusts have some form of religious (normally C of E) governance. If faith-based academy trusts can insist on controlling the admissions of other schools as well as their own, many more families will be locked into faith-based education.

Everywhere you turn, faith schools' institutional and privileged role in admissions creates unnecessary hardship and complexity for parents. It leads to decisions being continually taken in the interests of faith bodies, with little or no genuine transparency or consultation. It's time we had an open, community-led and accountable admissions system, and seriously reevaluate the suitability of faith groups running public schools in an increasingly secular society.

The NSS will be following the case closely. If you have been affected by similar issues, please get in touch.

If you would like to support parents' legal action, a Crowd Justice fundraiser for the legal action is aiming to raise £5,000 by 31 December.

Discuss on Facebook

Two independent Jewish schools banned from admitting new pupils

Two independent Jewish schools banned from admitting new pupils

Posted: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 09:07

Two independent Jewish schools in London have been barred from admitting new pupils after inspectors identified serious and persistent failings.

The Department for Education (DfE) published enforcement notices last week which it sent to the schools in August. The enforcement action prevents the schools from admitting new pupils.

Bnois Jerusalem Girls School was given a statutory notice in 2018 after it failed to meet standards in multiple inspections.

Its most recent Ofsted inspection in March found that "teaching about the scientific theories behind the origins of [the diversity of] life" was "completely omitted".

The report also said the content of the school's secular curriculum "remains narrow" and pupils were "not allowed to talk about" same-sex relationships or gender reassignment "at any time".

The school's previous failings have included teaching creationism in geography and science and failing to enter pupils for exams at GCSE level because leaders were not allowed to censor exam papers.

TTD Gur School, an all-boys school, failed to meet all standards inspected in March. The inspection report said its plans for teaching personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education did not include "opportunities to learn about the protected characteristics set out in the Equality Act 2010", including "the roles of women".

It said the school's secular subject curriculum was "weak", and pupils did not have enough opportunities to learn about Britain, other cultures and other countries.

The inspector was unable to find out about how pupils respect people from different backgrounds, because school leaders did not permit the inspector to discuss anything with pupils aside from "safety, safeguarding, learning, behaviour and bullying".

Leaders were unable to provide a curriculum policy or schemes of work for the subjects taught, the report said. Leaders could not show how they promote "mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs" or fundamental British values.

NSS head of education Alastair Lichten said: "These schools are failing because they prioritise religious indoctrination over teaching children the knowledge they need to prepare them for adult life.

"No school, whatever its ethos, should be allowed to deprive its pupils of their basic right to a suitable education."

"The DfE is right to take action. But if these schools continue to refuse to provide a decent standard of education, they must be closed down."

Discuss on Facebook

NSS calls for transparency over discriminatory school admissions

NSS calls for transparency over discriminatory school admissions

Posted: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 11:37

The National Secular Society has urged the new schools' minister to increase transparency over school admissions.

The NSS has written to the minister responsible for faith schools, Diana Barran, calling for information about whether schools have religiously selective oversubscription criteria to be included on a government database.

The Get Information About Schools (GIAS) service provides data on all schools in England. It is used by parents deciding on school choices, in addition to estate agents providing information on local schools. But GIAS does not currently record whether a school has a faith-based selective admissions policy.

Exceptions in the Equality Act 2010 allow faith schools with a religious character to religiously discriminate in their admissions if oversubscribed. The extent to which faith schools can discriminate depends on factors including school types, local policies, and number of applicants.

In response to a freedom of information request regarding the number of faith schools that can religiously discriminate, the Department for Education provided GIAS data on school type. But this data can mislead users, the NSS warned.

While GIAS records admissions policies as "selective" or "non-selective", the NSS said this information could "potentially serve to confuse or mislead users, as it only refers to academically selective admissions", which are far outnumbered by religious selection.

The NSS raised the example of voluntary aided (VA) Catholic schools. Almost all Catholic VA schools have admissions policies which allow them to select up to 100% of pupils based on faith if oversubscribed, but the vast majority (1,012) put "not applicable" in the GIAS field regarding admissions policies.

One hundred and sixty-two Catholic schools list their admissions policy as "non-selective", a term the NSS labeled "at best confusing and at worst misleading". Only two Catholic secondary schools, both grammar schools, list their admissions policy as "selective". The NSS has previously warned that such use of the term "non-selective" can be potentially misleading, particularly in proposals for new religiously selective schools.

Researchers have made various estimates on the number of schools or proportion of places with religious selection. However, admissions policies are often complex and can obfuscate the true level of religious discrimination.

Earlier this year the former schools minister Nick Gibb admitted that the DfE has not made an estimate of the number of pupils unable to access their nearest school because of religiously selective admissions.

The NSS's head of education, Alastair Lichten, said: "This lack of transparency and data is unjustifiable, regardless of one's view on the underlying issue of selection. If the state shamefully continues to sanction religious discrimination, it must at least record it. Families seeking school places need clarity over the barriers they may face, and we all need clarity over the numbers of pupils facing faith-based discrimination to allow for an informed public debate."

Update 18/11: In response to a written question in parliament from Dick Taverne, Diana Barran has said: "The department does not collect information on the number of schools that include faith-based criteria in their admission arrangements, nor the proportion of places allocated on the basis of faith. We have no plans to collect this information or to include this information in school statistics."

Discuss on Facebook

Image: patat, Shutterstock

‘Inadequate’ faith school failed to teach reproduction in science

‘Inadequate’ faith school failed to teach reproduction in science

Posted: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:35

A Jewish independent faith school has been criticised by inspectors for refusing to teach about reproduction in science classes.

Beis Ruchel D'Satmar London, a "strictly Orthodox Jewish" school for girls age 3-16 in Stamford Hill, was rated "inadequate" in an Ofsted report published yesterday.

During the inspection, held 8–10 June, leaders said "no aspect of sex education is taught in the school, not even reproduction in the context of an academic subject like science," according to the report.

The report said all content of the GCSE course is taught to Year 10 pupils, "except for reproduction". This means pupils are "disadvantaged at the outset" when preparing for science examinations.

The report said the "strongly held", "collective" view of parents was that "such teaching should take place in the home only, by parents and carers".

Pupils are "not given the opportunity to discuss issues about some important aspects of their personal development" and so are "not prepared well for life in modern Britain", the report said.

Teaching pupils of secondary school age relationships and sex education (RSE) is a statutory requirement.

Ofsted also criticised the school for not teaching pupils to "respect people who are of a different sexual orientation" or "people who change their gender". Sexual orientation and gender reassignment are protected characteristics in the Equality Act 2010. Schools are required to teach about these protected characteristics to secondary-age pupils in an age-appropriate manner.

Forced marriage concerns

In February a report from Jewish counter-extremism group Nahamu highlighted how a lack of relationships and sex education (RSE) contributes to forced marriage in strictly-Orthodox Jewish communities.

It said the lack of RSE in strictly-Orthodox Jewish schools means engaged couples may not be prepared for sexual relations, may not understand consent, and may not recognise abusive behaviours.

It also said the exclusion of any reference to LGBT+ people in Orthodox Jewish schools means LGBT+ people in these communities face "very serious issues of consent" when presented with a universal expectation of early, heterosexual marriage.

Other issues

Ofsted's report said children in the early years "do not get off to a good start" as children and adults communicate in Yiddish and the teaching of phonics "is held back for too long". Additionally, children do not take books home to practise reading with their parents, the report said.

The development of love for reading among older pupils was "limited by the choice of texts" available in the school.

In the past other Orthodox Jewish schools have been criticised for their limited choice of books, including Yesodey Hatorah Senior Girls' School, also in Stamford Hill.

Additionally, the report said the school 's leaders and governors "do not actively promote the fundamental British values of mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs."

In 2019 the school was barred from admitting new pupils that academic year after persistently failing standards. In an inspection that year, school inspectors were prevented from speaking to pupils about their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.

NSS comment

NSS head of education Alastair Lichten said: "With the problem of forced marriages in strictly-Orthodox Jewish communities increasingly coming to light, it is more important than ever to ensure all children, regardless of their parents' religious background, have access to age-appropriate, objective and inclusive RSE.

"Ofsted is right to penalise this school for refusing to teach about reproduction even in science. Children's rights to an education that keeps them safe and prepares them for adult life must not be undermined by extremist religious ideology, no matter how strongly-held."

Notes

  • Beis Ruchel D'Satmar London is registered for 810 girls between the ages of three and 16 years. However, according to Ofsted's report, there are 844 girls aged three to 16 years on the school's roll. The permitted number of pupils was revised by the registration authority from 200 to 810 in November 2020. According to Ofsted, "the school continues to be in breach of its registration agreement with the Department for Education".

Image by Pexels from Pixabay.

Discuss on Facebook

Challenge religious stigmatising of LGBT people, NSS tells Welsh government

Challenge religious stigmatising of LGBT people, NSS tells Welsh government

Posted: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 12:06

The National Secular Society has called on the Welsh government to challenge religious homophobia in education, healthcare and charities.

The Welsh government is consulting on its LGBTQ+ action plan, which aims to tackle inequalities and discrimination experienced by LGBT+ people.

In its response, the NSS highlighted barriers posed by religious organisations in achieving LGBT+ equality in Wales. It said the action plan needs "greater focus on the role on religion in anti-LGBT+ hate and discrimination".

LGBT+ inclusive education

The NSS welcomed the government's proposal to deliver "LGBTQ+ inclusive RSE for all". But it "strongly recommended" the government revisit recent curriculum reforms that still permit faith schools to teach relationships and sex education (RSE) from a faith-based perspective. This means children at some faith schools will continue to be taught same-sex relationships are wrong, the NSS said. It highlighted its 2018 findings that all 12 state-funded secondary schools in Wales with an RSE policy were teaching the subject within the tenets of Catholicism or the Church in Wales.

'Conversion therapy'

The NSS welcomed the government's commitment to tackle so-called 'conversion therapy'. It recommended legislation against forced conversion therapy, and said those harmed by the procedure should be able to seek redress. It said it should be a criminal offence for any healthcare professional to practice or support conversion therapy, and that improved education about the harms of the procedure was necessary in the healthcare sector.

Charities

The NSS said organisations that actively promote anti-LGBT+ ideology should be prevented from registering as charities. It recommended removing 'the advancement of religion' from the list of recognised charitable purposes, because it enables charities to promote homophobia as part of their religious ideology. It gave examples of a Cardiff-based Islamic charity with a video on its YouTube account about how to 'prevent sodomy' via Islamic modesty codes, and a Christian charity, also in Cardiff, that says anything that's not part of "God's good plan" for marriage should be "put to death" in a Sunday School resource.

Employment

The NSS recommended a review of gaps in the Equality Act 2010 that allow religious organisations to discriminate against potential employees on the basis of sexual orientation, gender reassignment and religion or belief. It warned this may be over-used to build an "exclusively heterosexual workforce".

NSS comment

NSS head of policy and research Megan Manson said: "We welcome the Welsh government's aims to tackle inequalities experienced by LGBT+ people.

"However, the government has shied away from challenging the religious fundamentalism that poses some of the greatest barriers to LGBT+ equality.

"Without taking this on, particularly in schools and charities, we will sadly continue to see anti-LGBT+ propaganda being promoted in the name of religion."

The consultation closes on 22 October.

Image: Pride Cymru 2016, Cardiff / Welsh Parliament (cropped), via Wikimedia Commons.

Discuss on Facebook.

Catholic school transforms into integrated one for first time in NI

Catholic school transforms into integrated one for first time in NI

Posted: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 16:57

Seaview Primary School reopened as Seaview Integrated Primary School.

Girl at school gates

Locked in and locked out: how faith schools restrict families’ choices

Posted: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 11:38

State funding of faith schools means many families are left without suitable schools. The narrative that faith schools are justified on the grounds of choice should be confronted, says Alastair Lichten.

The latest figures from the National Secular Society's choice delusion project, along with other research on discriminatory admissions, show how seriously faith schools are restricting choice across England. Hundreds of thousands of families a year face either being effectively locked in to faith schools, because there are few or no alternatives, or locked out of their local schools by religious discrimination.

At first glance, these may appear to be opposite problems. But both are caused by the proliferation and exclusionary nature of faith schools. This is a serious problem that left unconfronted will only grow as the country becomes more diverse and less religious.

Thirty per cent of people have little or no choice but a faith school at primary level, and 10% at secondary level. These figures represent around 475,000 pupils a year. Over 20,000 a year are assigned faith schools against their families' preferences. Estimating the number of pupils subject to direct religious discrimination in admissions is extremely difficult, but researchers have found that around half of C of E and all Catholic secondary school places are potentially subject to religious selection. It can be easy to forget the human stories behind these huge numbers and shocking statistics.

We regularly provide advice and support to parents experiencing the sharp end of the choice delusion. We hear from parents like Abhi from west London, whose four year old daughter was turned away from all their local schools on religious grounds. Rachael and David from Liverpool faced similar problems at secondary school for their son. Parents like Roxana from Bristol could pretend to be religious to access their local schools, but don't want to teach their children that dishonesty pays.

Michael from Bath told our No More Faith Schools campaign that he was effectively forced into putting all three of his children into a Catholic school. He had three schools to choose from: a terribly performing C of E school, and two Catholic schools.

Victoria from Medway told us: "My son has been placed into a faith school at the secondary school allocations. This was not one of my six choices, but no other school is available. The school say that they must attend all Catholic services even if they don't pray!"

Our research has revealed that 53% of rural primary schools are faith-based, and parents in some rural areas raised particular concerns about a lack of access to secular education. One told us she was looking at moving to a village – but the only school there, and the only schools in the next two villages, were all Church of England schools. Another said it was "impossible" to find a non-faith based school in the local area. Others said their children weren't being given the chance to make up their own minds about their own beliefs – for example because they were being forced into prayers, or were subject to evangelism.

Despite repeated parliamentary questions, research and lobbying by the NSS, the government recently admitted that it still has no estimate of its own on the extent of these problems. This means the choice delusion figures remain the best available and, combined with the new local authority scorecard, a powerful research tool for policymakers.

Breaking down these figures by local authority not only confirms the extent of this problem but provides important new insights. Serious questions must be asked about whether the worst performing local authorities are failing in their legal duties to ensure adequate suitable school provision, particularly where they are considering new school proposals. Public scrutiny and transparency around new faith schools is extremely limited, and claims that proposals will improve choice are often unevidenced and unchallenged, making reliable local data even more valuable.

And although the data only applies to England, the same problems affect families across the UK (where different methodology would be needed to work out how many are affected). Rohan from Newport told us: "My children have no choice but to attend a Church in Wales faith school, as with all our local council schools. It indoctrinates and teaches biased religious education. This is religious discrimination. Other faiths and atheism are dismissed." In Northern Ireland, over 90% of schools are segregated despite demand for integrated options.

Far from being the knockdown argument some supporters believe, 'choice' is actually one of the worst inequities caused by faith schools. Community ethos schools are suitable and accessible for pupils of all religious and non-religious backgrounds. The same cannot be said of schools organised around an exclusive faith ethos, let alone those with religious selection.

If we are to justify faith schools though this narrow concept of choice, this invites the question of why the 'choice' of schools organised around atheist, political or other ideological belief systems or identities is not also catered for.

The idea of choice is often wielded against families. Often when supporting someone dealing with inappropriate evangelism in schools, biased RE, religious sex ed, or coercive worship, they will tell me that their faith school was the only practical option. They didn't select it for faith but are told "you chose a faith school, what do you expect". Many faith schools openly state that they demand parents accept all aspects of a school's ethos if they have 'chosen' it.

Critics of faith schools are also accused of 'hypocrisy' when they have no choice but a faith school, or told to mind their own business if they are lucky enough to have the choice.

And choice focused narratives around faith schools are extremely limiting. They mischaracterise both the real-world options families have, and the social role of public education. Schools are community assets, not consumer products where individuals can choose freely between 100 brands to suite their personal taste. The harm caused by religious discrimination in school admissions and the exclusionary ethos of faith schools extends far beyond the inconvenient restriction of choice, and legitimises wider prejudices.

Moving towards a fully inclusive community-ethos education system, where all schools are suitable for pupils of all backgrounds, would be the best way to solve these problems. But in the meantime, the government must at least ensure that all families have a real option of a non-faith school.

Find out more about the NSS's research, let us know if you've been affected, and share our findings with your MP, through our Choice Delusion page.

Image: patat/Shutterstock.com.

Discuss on Facebook.

Derk Venema and Tanya Watkins

Ep 55: Pastafarianism and the meaning of ‘religion’

Posted: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 08:00

A spoof religion devised to mock creationism has attracted a global following. But what does 'religion' mean anyway?

In this episode, Emma Park speaks to three guests with different perspectives on Pastafarianism and the challenge that it poses to religious privilege.

Derk Venema (03:20) is an assistant professor in legal philosophy at the Open University of the Netherlands. He was the legal counsel for two Pastafarians who featured in the 2020 documentary I, Pastafari. Derk talks about their court cases, the difficulties of letting the state decide what counts as a religion, and the requirement that a religious belief should be 'serious'.

Captain Tanya Watkins (28:35) is the self-appointed leader of the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster in Australia. She discusses her failed attempts to have her church legally incorporated, as recognised religions can do, and explains why Pastafarianism is really about being nice to people – and eating pasta.

Dr Tony Meacham (43:17) is a law lecturer at Coventry University. He considers the challenge which movements like Pastafarianism pose to traditional definitions of 'religion', and the place of religion in English law.

Watch this episode on YouTube | Direct MP3 Link | Transcripts

Support the podcast, share with a friend, and leave a positive review everywhere you can.

Podcast produced by Emma Park for the National Secular Society (2021). All rights reserved.