Newsline 21 December 2012

Newsline 21 December 2012

Season's Greetings to all our readers – and thank you for your support in 2012. Newsline will take a break for the festive period and return on 11 January.
Read this week's Newsline in full (PDF)

News, Blogs & Opinion

NSS President’s Seasonal Message

Opinion | Fri, 21st Dec 2012

As we prepare for the holiday, it's a good time to reflect on the year past, and to assess our triumphs and failures, and to look forward to the year to come.

We've had a positive avalanche of statistics this year trying to fathom the extent of religious belief and adherence in Britain and around the world.

The interest was sparked, of course, by the increasing prominence of religious voices in public debate and the rise in aggressive religious demands. Sometimes these demands are simply made through the proper democratic channels of debate, sometimes they are made with threats, menaces, bombs and bullets.

The upheaval in the Middle East which started out so optimistically now has a dark shadow of Islamist tyranny hanging over it. One dictatorship, it seems, has been changed for another in Egypt. In Syria, the battle to depose a despot is rapidly turning into a war for religious dominance.

Christians and other minority religions live in fear of the fight against Assad coming to an end. They know it is at that point that their own persecution will begin.

And if religion can drive people insane, it seems to have made the whole of Pakistan in to one great asylum. The Islamist terrorists who are coming to dominate the country commit one grotesque outrage after another. Blasphemy law claims victim after victim – and an alarming number of them are Christians. This gives the impression that blasphemy law is just another weapon with which to beat religious minorities.

Malala Yousafzai, a young girl who simply wanted an education, was shot in the head by Islamists who are determined that women will remain illiterate and chained to their homes as slaves and vassals. I am proud that Britain offered her fine medical treatment and a safe haven.

Now we hear that five women who worked to eradicate polio among the poor and wretched in Pakistan have been murdered by the same kind of religious maniacs who justify their rampage with Koranic verses.

This is certainly true in Saudi Arabia, a theocratic dictatorship of such brutality, that all organised dissent was eradicated years ago. Its international ambitions, though, manifest themselves in the financing of mosques and religious institutions that provide cover for dangerous extremists all over the world. A small light in this nightmare came earlier this year when one brave young woman refused to be bullied into conformity when the notorious religious police objected to the way she was dressed. The young woman berated the policemen and recorded the confrontation on her phone. It was soon up on Youtube, but nothing has been heard of her since.

The American presidential election this year taught conservative religious leaders a long-overdue lesson – that their message of hate and intolerance is losing its power. The Catholic Church in particular grew arrogant and over-politicised, presenting a direct challenge to the President's plans for a national health insurance plan. They threw their might behind a campaign to defeat Obama, but their might turned out not to be as mighty as they thought.

And the Republicans' domination by the Protestant religious right also took a knock in the same election.

Nearer to home we have, for the first time in generations, a serious questioning of the Church of England's role in our constitution. After it failed to legalise women bishops and it challenged the Government's plans to legalise same-sex marriage, questions were asked in parliament about the legitimacy of its establishment as the state religion.

Poll after poll showed that religious adherence in this country is dropping like a stone. The Church, in its own defence, constantly waved the results of the 2001 census in our face, telling us that 72% of Britons are Christians.

But that weapon was taken out of their hands when the 2011 census showed that this figure had fallen to 59%. And even that was questionable given the leading wording of the census question.

The number of people who say they have no religion rose to 25%, far outstripping all the minority religious groups put together. And yet still we see an inordinate amount of attention heaped on the "faith leaders".

We even now have a "Minister for Faith" in the shape of Baroness Warsi. It is a position which allows her to continue to peddle the fiction that Britain is a religious country and that she is going to champion the interests of the "faith communities" as important voices in public policy-making. This is in complete denial of the facts.

She was particularly miffed when the NSS succeeded in winning a High Court action declaring prayers as part of council meetings to be illegal. It was a victory that put the question of secularism right at the top of the political agenda for a while. Even the Queen was moved to defend the Church's establishment in the face of our attack.

But then the pious Communities Minister, Eric Pickles, came up with what he regarded as a solution to the "secularism problem" when he unilaterally declared that the court's judgment was null and void because he had brought in the Localism Act.

Again, it was an entirely untested claim and, according to legal opinion we sought, did not give local authorities the powers to reinstate prayers on to their agendas as Mr Pickles stated. But he succeeded in muddying the waters, which was his aim.

The Prime Minister, David Cameron, seems an unlikely ally in the fight for social progress, but I suspect he has one eye on what happened in America and realises that the wind is not blowing in favour of traditional Conservatism (although his backbenchers huff and puff enough to cause a cyclone). He is a pragmatic politician who is not driven by an unquestioning attachment to theological considerations. He also sees that the Church of England and the Catholic Church have made a catastrophic mistake of swinging to the right, when the nation is headed in the other direction. Both have overstated their case and will pay the price in further losses of adherents.

Our constant campaigning against religious privilege and against Establishment has certainly put the Church of England on the back foot. When the census results were announced, and the NSS was widely quoted in the media questioning the continuation of the established church in the face of such a massive rejection, Church House went on the attack.

Maybe in an effort to distract attention from the glaring truth of the statistics, it tried to undermine the NSS's contribution to the debate by issuing a sneering press release directly attacking us. But such tactics are a sure indication that the Church of England now sees the NSS as a real threat.

But let us assure them that our threat is not to the Anglican Church (which is doing quite a good job of destroying itself, anyway), but to the idea of any church being established by law.

If the CofE relinquished its privileged status, it might find that it would be free to revive itself in a free market of faith. After all, the USA forbids the establishment of any religion and religion is far more vigorous there than it is here.

As it is, with the present flight from religion in Britain, it is sure and certain that the Church of England will be dead in a couple of generations, anyway.

As you can see from this – which is only the tip of a very big and constantly shifting iceberg – the topic of secularism is on the rise. We need to be on the front line of the debate, we need to be a force to be reckoned with. And we can only be that if we can show much more support.

It is important that, if you support our principles, you join us. We know that tens of thousands of people read our weekly Newsline and tens of thousands more regularly visit our website. If only those people would commit to their principles and join the NSS, we really would be a force to be reckoned with.

If you are already a member, then please renew your annual subscription — due in January — now (please note, if you joined after September 2012, your subscription is valid through the coming year, and if you have a standing order then you can ignore this request.).

We look forward to an eventful and successful 2013. And we hope you'll be with us to fight the best of all fights – for freedom and equality for all.

Season's greetings to all

Terry Sanderson, President, National Secular Society

MPs support bid to restore ‘public good’ presumption of religion

News | Thu, 20th Dec 2012

MPs have backed a bid by Conservative MP Peter Bone (right) to amend the Charities Act to restore the presumption that all religious groups are for the public benefit and therefore can be charities.

Mr Bone's Ten Minute Rule bill is aimed at protecting religious groups like the Preston Down Trust, a member of the Plymouth Brethren, who recently had its charitable status removed by the Charity Commission after it decided that the exclusivity with which the Church conducts many of its activities, did not provide sufficient benefits to the wider public.

Writing on the Conservative Home website, Peter Bone, an active member of the Church of England, said: "This is another sign of a growing secular movement against religious groups in this country and another example of the state interfering with the church. "

Introducing his bill to Parliament, he said: "What is happening is creeping secularism in society. With just a few days before we celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ, and in recognition of religious freedom, I urge right hon. and hon. Members to support my ten-minute rule Bill."

166 MPs voted in favour of Mr Bone's attempt to introduce the bill, with just 7 voting against.

Bills introduced under the ten-minute rule are generally used only as a means of making a political point as there is little parliamentary time available to pass the bill into law.

The move comes after a letter signed by 113 MPs in support of the Plymouth Brethren was was delivered to the Prime Minister on Monday. An additional letter demanding that ministers take action, signed by 53 MPs, including 45 Conservatives, was published in the Telegraph on Wednesday.

The decision not to grant charitable status to the Plymouth Brethren led to Christian MPs to accuse the Charity Commission of having "secularising agenda". Conservative MP Charlie Elphicke accused the Charity Commission of trying to suppress religion and predicted that the Plymouth Brethren case, where the organisation has been refused charity status, will be the first of many.

The Charity Commission chair, William Shawcross, has described such accusations as "quite simply, wrong."

After a series of recent parliamentary debates on the issue, a report detailing reasons why the Plymouth Brethren do not meet public benefit requirements was published by Paul Flynn, the Labour MP for Newport West.

The report, written by John Weightman, a former member of the Brethren, has also been submitted to the Charity Commission and the Public Administration Select Committee, of which Flynn is a member.

Mr Bone's motion was also opposed by the National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO).

Elizabeth Chamberlain, policy officer at NCVO, said: "Public benefit is what makes a charity a charity, and most are keen to demonstrate the value of their work.

"Peter Bone's plan risks downgrading religious charities in the public mind. They would become unique among charities in not having to show how they are of benefit to the public."

In a recent Lords debate about the role of religion in public life, Baroness Berridge, who has family members in the Exclusive Brethren, questioned whether religious groups that 'harm health and split families' should be allowed to be charities. The Conservative peer called for a former Archbishop to set up a church-led inquiry into the theological and psychological implications of Exclusive Brethren beliefs.

You can read the introduction of the bill and a full breakdown of how MPs voted on Hansard

Take action: urge your MP to support free speech

News | Thu, 20th Dec 2012

The House of Lords recently passed an amendment to remove "insulting words" from the scope of Section 5 of the Public Order Act. Read the full story.

Despite the Government and Opposition whipping against the amendment, Peers voted for it by 150 to 54, including a majority of Peers from every party. The argument for reform is strong and the support very broad.

The Bill containing the amendment, the Crime and Courts Bill, is due in the Commons in January.

The near 100 majority chalked up in the Lords despite opposition from the Conservative and Labour frontbenches demonstrates a realistic prospect of success in the Commons, provided we keep up the momentum. That's where you come in.

We need your support to ensure that MPs retain this vital free speech measure. Please write to your MP, explaining why you think that the police should not be in the business of protecting us from feeling insulted. Please ask them to urge the Home Office to accept Clause 38 of Crime and Courts Bill.

To contact your MP you can also use our easy online form on the Reform Section 5 website.

Find out more about the campaign to Reform Section 5.

Sheffield Council latest to axe free travel to religious schools

News | Mon, 17th Dec 2012

Sheffield City Council is the latest to scrap free transport for children attending religious schools.

At a meeting last week, Councillors were presented with three options for reforming the discretionary travel policy for denominational schools, as the authority tries to meet a £50 million funding shortfall next year.

The first option was to keep the existing arrangements, whereby many children attending church schools are eligible for free bus passes, to remove them on a phased basis or to remove them entirely.

Alena Bridges, the council's assistant director of inclusion and learning services said that the phased removal would have seen the council save £47,000 a year, but removing them entirely was said to save "just under £250,000".

Removal of the discretionary travel support, mainly affecting children attending Notre Dame and All Saints secondary schools, had generated fierce opposition from parents.

Coun Jackie Drayton, cabinet member responsible for schools, said: "It's with a heavy heart that I asked officers to look into this and it's with a heavy heart that I support option three."

She said that the existing arrangement was "not equitable" as it only covered children attending church schools and left the council open to legal challenge from parents who wanted to send their children to non-church schools which incurred travel costs.

She said that she had written to Bishop John Rawsthorne at the Catholic Diocese of Hallam to ask: "is there any way in which the Catholic Church and schools could set up a hardship fund as a safety net" for the children affected by the removal of travel support.

Children eligible for free school meals will still get free travel.

You can find out more about this issue by reading our briefing paper:
Faith Schools: School Transport Briefing

Increase in proportion of non-religious in armed forces

News | Tue, 18th Dec 2012

Members of the UK's armed forces are still more inclined to claim a religious affiliation and to say they are Christian than the population as a whole, but the situation is changing fairly rapidly.

On 1 April 2012 the proportion of armed forces personnel declaring no religion was 14.7%, up from 9.5% in 2007. It was lowest in the Army (11.9%) and highest in the Naval Service (20.1%), with 17.5% in the Royal Air Force. Across all three services the number of Christians declined from 89.7% in 2007 to 83.5% in 2012 (85.7% in the Army, 81.5% in the Royal Air Force, 78.9% in the Naval Service). That leaves a mere 1.9% in 2012 professing a non-Christian faith, an improvement on the 0.8% of five years earlier but still a significant under-representation in terms of society as a whole.

The religious affiliations of civilian personnel working for the armed forces have only been collected since 2008, and the declaration rate had still only climbed to 67.6% in 2012. Of those stating their religion in 2012, 24.1% said that they had none, very close to the English and Welsh average at the 2011 census (25.1%). The number of Christians was 70.8%, much higher than the 59.3% in the census, while non-Christians amounted to 5.1% (against 8.4% in the census). It should be remembered that the comparison with the census is not on a strict like-for-like basis since there was a non-response rate of 7.2% at the census.

Source: Ministry of Defence, United Kingdom Defence Statistics, 2012, tables 2.12 (armed forces) and 2.32 (civilian personnel, including a breakdown by pay band). Prepared by Defence Analytical Services and Advice, and published on 12 December 2012.

See the whole research (pdf)

French Government acts to protect secularism from religious extremists

News | Tue, 18th Dec 2012

The French Government appears to be lining up for a full-scale confrontation with the Catholic Church, which is increasingly trying to interfere in political processes.

The socialist administration has announced it intends to establish a new agency to ensure the nation's secularism is protected from religious extremism.

The agency will monitor extremist groups — not just Islamists, but of all faiths — and if they show signs of what the Interior Minister, Manuel Valls (right), called "religious pathology" legal action to dissolve the organisation will be taken – and foreign imams preaching hatred and violence will be deported.

Speaking at a conference on secularism, Mr Valls pointed to the incident last year when a French Islamist had gone on a killing spree, shooting to death three soldiers and four Jewish people. He said this illustrated how quickly religiously radicalised people could turn to violence. Mr Valls and two other government ministers said that the new agency would protect and promote the tradition of "laïcité", which is the French version of secularism. The previous government of Nicolas Sarkozy had undermined this principle by pandering to the Catholic Church.

"The aim is not to combat opinions by force, but to detect and understand when an opinion turns into a potentially violent and criminal excess," Mr Valls said. "The objective is to identify when it's suitable to intervene to treat what has become a religious pathology."

Mr Valls made clear that this was not an anti-Muslim exercise, but would cover all religious extremists. He mentioned the ultra-traditionalist Catholic group Civitas, which has aligned itself with the fascist Front National Party. He said the police were already monitoring Civitas as many of its activities already skirt the law.

Valls said the government had a duty to combat religious extremism because it was "an offence to the republic" based on a negation of reason that puts dogma ahead of the law. He cited extreme religious groups in other counties, Salafists, ultra-Orthodox Jews and others who sought to separate themselves from the modern world.

Announcing his initiative on Sunday, the President, Francois Hollande, said the new agency would also study ways to introduce classes on secular morality in state schools.

Education Minister Vincent Peillon told the conference the classes would stress the French values of equality and fraternity that teachers say pupils — especially in poorer areas with immigrant populations — increasingly do not respect. "We have to teach this and it's not being done," he said. "If we don't teach it, they won't learn it."

Valls urged the more militant secularists at the conference not to see religions as sects to be opposed and to understand that established religions could help fight against extremists. "We have to say that religions are not sects, otherwise sects are religions," he said.

Meanwhile the confrontation between the Catholic Church and the Government over plans to legalise gay marriage is ramping up. The Church has called several large-scale demonstrations throughout the country in opposition to the plans, while last weekend up to 150,000 people marched through the streets of Paris in support of the proposals.

Now, Housing Minister Cecile Duflot has warned that she might soon requisition unused church buildings in Paris for the homeless this winter. She told the Bishop of Paris that she "would not understand if the church does not share our goal of solidarity".

Ms Duflot, a Green Party member, denied any connection between her threat and the debate over gay marriage, which her party vigorously supports. But Christine Boutin, a Catholic ex-MP accused the Government of "Cathophobia".

See also: Tens of thousands take the streets of Paris in support of gay marriage

Catholic Church fails to stop Philippines contraception bill

News | Tue, 18th Dec 2012

The Philippine parliament approved legislation on Monday that permits government funding for contraception and for sex education classes in schools.

The legislation was passed despite ferocious opposition from the Catholic Church, which exerts a domineering power bloc in the country.

The legislation has been on the cards for over a decade, but progress has been thwarted so far by the Church. Now the Senate and the House of Representatives passed different versions of the bill which will have to be reconciled before President Benigno Aquino III has an opportunity to sign it.

Sen. Miriam Defensor-Santiago, one of the leading advocates of the bill said: "The Catholic church has steadfastly opposed the (reproductive health) bill for 13 years. But I humbly submit this afternoon that there is no force more powerful than an idea whose time has come."

Aquino, who certified the bill as urgent, considers it a major step toward reducing maternal deaths and promoting family planning in the impoverished country, which has one ofAsia's fastest-growing populations. In its usual hyperbolic style, the Church predicted all kinds of moral catastrophe if the bill was passed.

Archbishop Socrates Villegas, vice president of thePhilippines' Bishops Conference, said that "the wide and free accessibility of contraceptives will result in the destruction of family life. Money for contraceptives can be better used for education and authentic health care," he said, adding that "those who corrupt the minds of children will invoke divine wrath on themselves."

The Catholic bishops have a long history in interfering in and controlling the politics of the Philippines. They mobilised popular support for the 1986 "people power" revolt that toppled dictator Ferdinand Marcos and the 2001 overthrow of another president, Joseph Estrada.

An independent survey in June last year found that 68% of respondents agreed that the government should fund all means of family planning. An October survey of 600 teenagers in Manila, the capital, also carried out by Social Weather Stations, an independent opinion-polling institute, found that 87% believed the government should provide reproductive health services to the poor.

The United Nations said early this year that the bill would help reduce an alarming number of pregnancy-related deaths, prevent life-threatening abortions and slow the spread of AIDS.

The U.N. Population Fund says 3.4 million pregnancies occur in the Philippines every year. Half are unintended and a third are aborted, often in clandestine, unsafe and unsanitary procedures. The fund says 11 women in the country die of pregnancy-related causes every day. Nearly 70 percent of women use no contraception at all.

Reproductive health programmes are patchy and often unavailable to the poor. Some local governments have passed ordinances banning the sale of condoms and their distribution in health clinics.

"Many Filipino women have faced difficulties and sometimes death because of the absence of a comprehensive and consistent reproductive health policy. This law can change that," said Carlos Conde,Asiaresearcher at New York-based Human Rights Watch.

Former Manila Mayor Lito Atienza, who opposes the bill, said pro-church groups were considering asking the Supreme Court to declare the bill unconstitutional. "You cannot legislate anything that is contrary to one's faith," he told reporters.

One Law for All’s ‘Sounds of Freedom’ Song Competition –calling for entries.

News | Thu, 20th Dec 2012

The One Law for All campaign is inviting musicians and songwriters to create and submit their original material for a song competition.

"Change comes about by breaking taboos and pushing aside that which is deemed sacred and art is such an important way of doing this" says Maryam Namazie, Spokesperson of One Law for All

Song entries should be focused on issues that relate to the work 'One Law for All' is engaged with, discussing themes like religion, freedom, secularism, Sharia law, equal rights & religious arbitration.

Submissions must include a recording of the song and a lyric sheet sent either by email to soundsoffreedommusic@gmail.com or as physical CD to:

BM Box2387,London. WC1N 3XX. United Kingdom

Entrants may enter as many songs as they wish. Judging will not be based on the quality of the recording but it needs to be audible. A concert showcasing the entrants will be held on Saturday December 7th 2013 and the finalists will be invited to perform at the five year anniversary celebration of One Law for All in December. The final date for submissions is September 30th 2013. We look forward to hearing your entries.

Secularist of the Year 2013

We're searching for nominees for the £5,000 Irwin prize for Secularist of the Year – and we need your help to find them. If you would like to nominate someone as a contender, just send their name and a few words about why you think they have contributed something significant to the cause of secularism to enquiries@secularism.org.uk

In the meantime, tickets are now on sale for the presentation lunch, which will be held in Londonon Saturday 23 March 2013. Make sure you're there for our social event of the secular year. Full details and tickets here.

NSS Speaks Out

Keith Porteous Wood was on BBC Radio York and Radio Oxford talking about the census.

Annual Report 2012

For a full account of our campaigning activities in 2012, please read our online Annual Report.