Newsline 14 June 2013

Newsline 14 June 2013

Not a member? The NSS is non-profit organisation which receives no funding from government or other public bodies. Our campaigning is wholly supported by our members and supporters, people like you who share our belief in the urgent need to keep religion and politics separate. Please join us today

Read this week's Newsline in full

News, Blogs & Opinion

Parliamentary report published on relationship between local authorities and faith groups

News | Mon, 10th Jun 2013

The All Party Parliamentary Group, 'Christians in Parliament', has published a report, Faith in the Community, which looks at the relationship between local authorities and churches.

The group's chairman, Gary Streeter MP, has stated that the aim of the report is to address the "chasm between the perception of faith groups nationally and the reality of their work in local communities where they get their hands dirty on a daily basis". The research follows up the findings of Clearing the Ground, another report produced by Christians in Parliament last year, and comes as part of an overall aim to enhance the working relationship between local authorities and faith groups.

Its findings are based on the responses to a survey of 155 local authorities in England, Scotland and Wales.

The report describes religious literacy as one of the greatest hindrances to faith groups and authorities working together effectively. It argues that "local authorities often have a poor understanding of faith groups, their beliefs and how those beliefs work themselves out in the lives of the faithful". Likewise, it found, faith groups "often have an equally poor understanding of how local government works and the language that is required to engage with it".

Yesterday, Mr Streeter said that faith groups are more important than ever "because they are the people who are most visibly committed to working in their communities and serving those around them. They are the people who turn up before funding begins and stay after grants are cut"

However, Terry Sanderson, President of the National Secular Society, has commented: "The Christians in Parliament group is not objective in its approach. Its main purpose is to promote Christianity in parliament and to ensure that religion has special privileges.

"The idea that Christian groups are being turned away by local authorities when they offer to provide services has some basis in reality. The reason so many councils are suspicious of religious groups is because there is always an agenda attached to their work. They may promise not to proselytise, but the very idea of a Christian organisation providing an essential service is already off-putting to some people.

"Many Christian groups do good work, but some also abuse the power they are given when using public money. Some have had funding withdrawn when they demanded prayers for the services they provide or have used the money directly for religious purposes rather than the purpose it was provided for."

Mr Sanderson said much progress could be made if local authorities provided a legally binding contract that required all organisations working on their behalf - with taxpayers' money - not to use that money for anything other than what it was provided for, and that ensured services would be available to the whole community without discrimination and without the demand for participation in unrelated activities, such as worship.

"Religious groups are often unwilling to accept money on this basis and that is where the conflict arises," said Mr Sanderson. "Christian groups should be careful not to help local authorities to divest themselves of vital public services. Once the money dries up, the service will be lost if the religious groups cannot raise the necessary funds themselves – and quite often they cannot. Christians should be demanding that the Government and local councils continue to provide the services that the poor and disadvantaged depend upon."

Rethink ordered over discriminatory school transport cuts

News | Tue, 11th Jun 2013

A controversial plan by Flintshire Council to cut funding for transport to faith schools for pupils unable to prove their religious beliefs has been thrown into doubt after a scrutiny committee called for it to be scrapped.

On Thursday 6 June, the Council's overview and scrutiny committee, which gives non-executive councillors the opportunity to hold the Cabinet to account, ordered a rethink of the policy.

Speaking during Flintshire Council's lifelong learning overview and scrutiny committee meeting, opponent Cllr Nigel Steele-Mortimer said he wished to see the current proposal amended or abandoned altogether.

TCC, an alliance of community groups in North East Wales, condemned the proposals, saying they are discriminatory and will limit the educational choices for the poorest pupils.

TCC Lead organiser, Kay Polley, said: "The proposals will treat children differently because of their religious background. This is quite simply discrimination. Flintshire's only faith based secondary school, Saint Richard Gwyn, is open to all, but these proposals will limit access to the school for children not from a Catholic background, and even those from Catholic families who cannot provide "proof" of their faith."

The policy has also been criticised by the National Secular Society for using religion to single out specific children for discrimination.

Stephen Evans, campaigns manager of the National Secular Society, said; "We are pleased the Cabinet are being forced to look again at this policy. If parents wish to send their children to a school with a particular faith ethos, the associated transport costs should be a parental responsibility, rather than the responsibility of the state. It is however grossly unfair to target pupils unable to prove their religious beliefs for cuts in this way.

"It is regrettable that provisions in the Equality Act which place a duty on local authorities not to discriminate against people on grounds of religion or belief do not apply to the area school transport. For every religious privilege there's a victim, and this sort of policy highlights how the non-religious lose out when faith groups win exemptions from equality legislation."

The policy will now be looked at again by the council's cabinet on June 18.

Secular petitions highlight the sectarian issues in Scottish education

Opinion | Thu, 13th Jun 2013

The last few weeks have seen the topic of religious observance (RO) in schools hit the headlines in Scotland. Two petitions have been lodged, one at central government and one at local government level.

Secular Scotland, a group of Glasgow secularists, launched a petition asking the Scottish Government to change the current parental RO opt-out provision to an opt-in, while petition by NSS member and Edinburgh parent Veronica Wikman, backed by Edinburgh Secular Society, asked the City of Edinburgh Council to remove RO completely from Edinburgh schools.

Some observers believe that the issue of RO in schools will be the next battleground when it comes to "culture wars" in Scotland once the same-sex marriage debate has run its course. This is partly due to the highly questionable objectives and nature of some Christian groups now active in schools with the blessing of the Scottish Government's guidance on RO, and indeed with the patronage of the Church of Scotland and the Catholic Church in Scotland.

Predictably, both petitions have drawn fire from religious interests north of the border. Michael McGrath, director of the Scottish Catholic Education Service, said religious observance was part of the "fabric of the community life" in Catholic schools and they would contest any effort to remove the statutory requirement for it. McGrath added: "Some secularist groups appear determined to dismantle any public signs of this country's religious traditions, values and practices. We would be happy for them to establish their own schools as 'non-faith schools', just as the Catholic community did in the 19th century."

So here is the Catholic Church solution – yet more sectarianism in Scotland from an organisation that assails us regularly with its victimhood as a result of the sectarianism we already have. It wants this new sectarianism introduced into an already sectarian education system, where yet more innocent and intellectually vulnerable children are to be segregated and educated separately in accordance with the religious beliefs of their parents. And of course McGrath prefers to rely on the old euphemisms of 'traditions, cultures and practices' when he really means privileged access for religion for purposes of indoctrination.

McGrath added that his solution would allow non-believing parents "to promote their own values."

A similar call was made by a Dundee Free Church of Scotland minister and director of an organisation called the Solas Centre for Public Christianity. The Reverend David Robertson has urged the government to allow secularists and the Churches to run their own state-funded schools, to ensure that parents are offered "real choice, real diversity and equality" and where secularists "have their schools, teaching their values and let the Churches return to a system where we run state-funded Christian schools."

Robertson's proposed solution points up additional problems. The National Secular Society maintains that schools should teach universal values, common to all regardless of what any parent believes or doesn't believe about the supernatural. An education system that teaches different sets of values to different sets of children cannot possibly lead to a safer, happier and more integrated world.

Robertson's church has been one of the most ardent and high-profile critics of equal rights for gay people and same-sex marriage, occasionally rivalling the now disgraced Cardinal O'Brien in its splenetic outpourings. Robertson himself wrote a book to challenge the God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, arguing from essentially a biblical creationist perspective. One wonders what values would be taught in his Christian schools about the role of women in society, or a woman's right to control her own body, or evolution or the rights of gay people. No doubt there would be more Islamic, Sikh and Hindu schools in Scotland too, and thus even more religious sectarianism and competing values, with the 'diversity' on offer being little more than further segregated and isolated communities running parallel with segregated after-school activities such as scout groups.

In an interesting aside to this debate, there are independent schools in Scotland run by the Focus Learning Trust, a front for the Plymouth Brethren Christian Church and which claims its schools "are committed to values that are based on the Holy Bible" and uphold "fundamental Christian teachings and beliefs" and "the truth and authority of the Holy Bible." Yet the Trust also states on its web site that while its schools are registered as Independent Schools with a Special Religious Character, "no formal religious observances or services are held at the school. Current Affairs and Bible Studies programs are the responsibility of the community."

It is reasonable to ask why the Scottish Government is promoting Religious Observance in schools while a fundamentalist Christian sect doesn't bother with them and sees them – rightly, as it happens – as the responsibility of family and community outwith the school day and life.

Whatever the merits or otherwise of the secular petitions currently lodged in the administrative processes of government is Scotland, two things are clear. One, whether examining the denominational or non-denominational school system in Scotland, both petitions draw attention to the fact that schools have been turned into pulpits and churches, while secularists would argue that schools should be for teaching, not preaching. Two, both petitions have managed to force the religious to reveal their own take on the purpose and nature of Scotland's education system – to be a playground for sectarianism, discrimination, segregation and indoctrination. Or should that be "real choice, real diversity and equality?"

Russian parliament passes new blasphemy law as protesters call for secular state

News | Wed, 12th Jun 2013

Russia's parliament has overwhelmingly approved a new blasphemy law allowing jail sentences of up to three years for "offending religious feelings", an initiative launched in the wake of the trial against the anti-Kremlin punk band Pussy Riot.

Under the proposed new law, Russian citizens would face a year in jail for "intentional" and "public" displays that cause "offense to religious sensibilities," and up to three years in jail for desecrating religious sites and paraphernalia".

Mikhail Markelov, a member of the ruling United Russia party, said: "We are not talking about the subjective term 'religious offense', which is admittedly difficult to qualify. The law only punishes public acts that obviously go out of their way to insult a religion." She said the new law has been "chiseled to perfection, and reflects the desires of the majority of our society."

The Russian parliament, the Duma, will hear a third and final reading in the next week. If approved, it will then go to President Putin for final approval.

The Duma this week also unanimously passed a federal law banning gay "propaganda" – imposing heavy fines for providing information about homosexuality to people under 18. Together, the two laws are intended to boost the power of the Russian Orthodox Church, which professes total allegiance to the state.

In a recent public address President Vladimir Putin praised the special role that the church plays in the society. "The church incessantly cares about strengthening high moral and ethical ideals and family traditions in society, and the younger generation's upbringing. The church does a lot to solve pressing social problems," said Putin.

International rights groups have called the current situation in Russia the worst human rights climate in the post-Soviet era.

Meanwhile, in the city of Tomsk, protesters have gathered for a rally for a secular state and freedom of conscience.

This rally's co-organiser Andrei Verkhov called for top-ranking officials to adhere to the constitution so that religion is not imposed. "It [the constitution] says that no religion shall enjoy preferences but we can see that the authorities breach the constitution by granting preferences to worshippers," Verkhov said.

Protesters carried signs calling for the abolition of religious subjects in schools.

Joan Smith announced as new co-chair of mayor’s panel on violence against women

News | Mon, 10th Jun 2013

Joan Smith, an honorary associate of the National Secular Society, has been announced as the new co-chair of the Mayor of London's Violence Against Women and Girls Panel (VAWG).

The panel brings together representatives from a number of sectors across London: Councils, police, health services, London Criminal Justice Partnership, Association of London Directors of Children's Services, and those from the voluntary sector who specialise in tackling violence against women.

The panel's role is to improve the ways in which the city tackles and, ultimately, prevents violence against women. Smith notes that as part of its ambitions, the panel seeks to ensure a consistent service across London for victims of sexual and domestic abuse, to look into setting up special courts for sexual offences, to ease the ordeal of giving evidence, and support women who want to leave prostitution. Another priority is to ensure successful prosecutions for female genital mutilation (FGM); this comes within the context of no one ever having been on trial for, let alone convicted of, the crime in the UK - despite the practice having been outlawed since 1985.

The need for the Mayor's panel is very real - just last year in London: there were 48,873 domestic violence crimes reported to the Metropolitan Police, nationally the police remain unaware of 81% of domestic abuse victims; 3043 rape offences, 7,982 serious sexual assaults and 1780 other sexual offences were reported; there were 447 trafficking for sexual exploitation offences reported; and 21% of the 1485 cases of forced marriage recorded across the UK were identified in London.

Smith says of the role, "I've spent a great deal of my career writing about violence against women... So I didn't think twice when I was approached to become co-chair of the Mayor of London's Violence Against Women and Girls Panel….It's both daunting and exciting, a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to have a practical effect on something I've cared passionately about all my adult life".

Joan Smith's 'The Public Woman' is out now, and available to buy on Amazon

Reaction to Woking parking challenge reveals national implications

Opinion | Thu, 13th Jun 2013

By Terry Sanderson

There has been some interesting reaction to our challenge to Woking Borough Council's policy of providing free parking for worshippers in the town.

The Kentish Gazette, for instance, revealed that there is also subsidised parking for worshippers:

Churchgoers in Canterbury, Herne Bay and Whitstable, and Quakers in Faversham, can buy a £30-a-year worshippers' permit, which allows them free parking in the nearest car park to their church during services," The paper reported.

Canterbury City Council has offered worshippers' permits since 2001, with 250 people currently signed up. Permit holders must gain a minister's signature in support of their application.

Spokesman Rob Davies said: "We review the range of permits we offer and their cost each year, and the worshippers' permit will be looked at again in the autumn as part of the annual parking review. We are aware of the test case in Woking and will follow what happens."

Canterbury Cathedral spokesman Lisa Emanuel says it will not comment until the outcome of the case, only choosing to say: "We are grateful for the support that we receive from Canterbury City Council."

The Kentish Gazette then followed this up with an editorial, which reads as follows:

Cheap parking is not a divine right

Churches across Canterbury and Faversham will be keeping a close eye on the campaign to overturn special parking permits for worshippers.

The National Secular Society's (NSS) claim against Woking Borough Council to get rid of the 'pray and display' scheme could have major consequences for our churchgoers.

Last month, the Church of England said attendances at services was stabilising after years of decline - although in Canterbury they have decreased.

Could losing the perk of subsidised parking sound the death knell for city churches, with congregations opting not to pay the weekend charges in the same way shoppers do for time in the city?

One point the NSS does make, which is hard to argue against, is the thousands and thousands of pounds in lost revenue councils are foregoing to run the worshippers' scheme.

Whether you are religious or not, surely it is plain to see any income the council can generate is crucial at a time when the economy is flat lining and the shoots of recovery are not forthcoming.

Maybe this case could lead to a watershed in Canterbury where worshippers lose the divine right to cheap parking and the prayers for more money in the council coffers are answered.

Meanwhile, the Yorkshire Evening Post, carried a letter from Mr Michael Sargood of Meanwood. It reads:

In the past few weeks I have had the misfortune of attending services at Leeds Cathedral with my well-intending partner. On both occasions, the congregation has been encouraged to sign petitions.

The first was in opposition to the proposed removal of a whopping £800,000 of entirely discretionary funding by the Leeds council taxpayer to ship children the length and breadth of the city so that they can attend a faith school of their parents' preference, when they have perfectly good non-faith schools on their doorstep. This represents a staggering five per cent of Leeds's entire home-to-school transport budget and could pay for over 25 much-needed teachers.

As such funding is not available to accommodate other parental preferences – such as sending their child to a sports college or a school with academy status or the proposed change would simply level the playing field for non-believers.

The second petition was in opposition to the introduction of Sunday parking fees in Leeds. Again, where Sunday parking fees have been introduced in other parts of the country in recent months, notably in Woking, the local churches have been successful in securing exemption for their congregations. This, despite the fact that Sunday shoppers pump money into the economy while worshippers merely take a free biscuit and sip of wine and promptly leave. Surely, everyone should pay or no-one should.

Why must these wealthy institutions – which claim to stand for fairness – constantly plead for special treatment and dispensations? And more importantly, why do we so often pander to them?

This pleading has been all too clearly exemplified at a national level too, with churches making aggressive demands for exemption from teaching about gay marriage in their schools and exemption from equality laws in their recruitment, notably of female clergy.

I hope that our councillors have the courage to resist pressure from these self-interested private members clubs and that taxpayers are not asked to subsidise others' faith.

Meanwhile, churchgoers in Edinburgh are also lobbying for concessions.

‘Reasonable accommodation’ debate rages in Canada over football turban ban

News | Thu, 13th Jun 2013

A provincial Canadian football federation has been suspended by the Canadian Soccer Association (CSA) over its refusal to allow Sikh children wearing turbans to play in official matches.

The CSA said it had taken the action against the Quebec Soccer Federation after it gave no indication of overturning the ban, which has triggered a national debate about religion's place in the public sphere.

The Quebec Soccer Federation (QSF) said the move was being taken for safety reasons.

The CSA suspension say the ban will be lifted once it receives demonstration that the QSF has lifted the ban and satisfactorily applies the Canadian Soccer Association's policy in the matter.

QSF is reported to have made a decision in response to its ban but will not reveal it until next week.

Quebec Premier Pauline Marois, defended the Quebec Soccer Federation's ban on turbans, saying: "I think the Quebec federation has the right to make its own rules. It's not subject to the Canadian federation in that respect."

The World Sikh Organization of Canada said it was considering a legal challenge.

Many commentators have also condemned the ban. Patrick Lagacé, a columnist for Montreal's La Presse said Quebec has a "strange view of secularism". He said "We collectively reserve our outrage for cases when secularism comes heads on – in a real or perceived manner – against religions other than Catholicism.

"When it comes to "our" religion, we are suddenly much more lenient. In the National Assembly, behind the Speaker's throne, you find a crucifix. If you think it sends a bad message about separation of church and state, too bad – politicians of all stripes will tell you that it's not a religious object; it's a symbol of our cultural heritage!"

Mr Lagacé also accused the political class of remaining silent when the mayor of Saguenay, Jean Tremblay, launched a "legal crusade" for the right to say a prayer before city council meetings.

A FIFA spokesperson confirmed that Sikh turbans & patkas can be permitted under Law 4 of the laws of the game.

In 2012, The International Football Association Board (IFAB) lifted a ban on female footballers wearing the Islamic headscarf on the field of play.

Also see:

A Turban Ban Is Ignorant, Not Secular

A case for the Quebec soccer turban ban

Iain Banks dies

News | Mon, 10th Jun 2013

Iain Banks, celebrated author and honorary associate of the National Secular Society, has died at the age of 59. Mr Banks was an enthusiastic secularist and an atheist who valued rational thought and a just society.

Terry Sanderson, President of the National Secular Society, said: "We were always very proud to have Iain Banks among our number. His fabulous literary achievements go without saying, and these will be his lasting epitaph. We are sorry that such an inspired writer and a genuinely warm and genial character has died at such an early age. We should be grateful, though, for the wonderful legacy of stories he has left behind that will entertain and inspire readers for generations to come."

An obituary can be read here.

Read this week's Newsline in full (PDF)

NSS Speaks Out

Keith Porteous Wood was on BBC Radio Ulster talking about the Woking parking challenge. Terry Sanderson was quoted in the Times in relation to the amount of religion on the BBC (subscription).