Skip to main content|
Challenging Religious Privilege

Mon, 8 Sep 2008

Concordat Watch

NSS Shop

NSS Newsline
newsnow

News Shorts

Billions of dollars have been stolen in the USA by religious con-men anxious to exploit the gullibility of the believers. According to a report from the North American Securities Administrators Association (a group of state officials who work to protect investors), between 1984 and 1989, about $450 million was stolen in religion-related scams, the association says. In its latest count — from 1998 to 2001 — the toll had risen to $2 billion. Rip-offs have only become more common since then.

The ownership of a 29 foot high cross in San Diego, California, whose legality has been contested for 17 years by an atheist, Philip Paulson, on the grounds that it discriminates against non-Christians, has been transferred to the federal government. A series of court decisions had deemed the structure, built in 1954 to honour Korean War veterans, unconstitutional because it stands on public property and that it should be removed. Mr Paulson vowed to continue his struggle.

The Church of England took time out from pressurising the government to pay for the upkeep of its churches to announce that it will be spending an estimated £6 million on restoring a Bishop’s Palace so that Archbishop John Sentamu can have sumptuous new apartments. Mr Sentamu is presently living in a tent to show his solidarity with those displaced by the Middle East conflict. He often speaks out about how sorry he is that most of the world has to live in poverty. The Church of England has £5 billion in the bank.

You can keep up to date with the latest news stories, features and commentaries from the international media by checking with out “What the Papers Say” feature on the website. Carefully chosen items are updated daily. Take a look and be informed. www.secularism.org.uk


Make a Donation

Thu, 04 Sep 2008

Fundamentalist Christians are trying to reintroduce the blasphemy law by stealth, says the National Secular Society.

Tue, 29 Jul 2008

The fact that this case was won while another case – that of 16- year old Lydia Playfoot and her claim in 2007 to want to wear a “chastity ring” in school – was thrown out of court seems in itself to be discriminatory.