Newsline 9 September 2016

Newsline 9 September 2016

The deeply damaging plans announced by the Government to relax admissions rules for faith schools are a terrible blow for social cohesion. At a time when the Government should be doing everything it can to promote an integrated society, it has instead decided to worsen the effects of divisive faith schools.

The Government speaks of the need to foster integration and social cohesion, but by removing the admissions cap that governs faith school admissions they are promoting divisive religious segregation.

We'll be opposing plans to increase religious segregation in schools every step of the way.

What will our society look like in 100 years if we divide generations of children by their parents' religion? The effects of this short-sighted policy will be disastrous. We're trying to stop this from happening, but we need your help.

News, Blogs & Opinion

NSS calls for rethink over Government plans to relax faith schools admissions rules

News | Fri, 9th Sep 2016

The National Secular Society has urged the Government to rethink plans to allow new faith schools to select all of their pupils on the basis of faith.

The BBC reported that the Government will propose 'relaxing' the admissions cap which currently means new faith schools can select only half of their pupils by faith.

In a letter to Prime Minister Theresa May, the NSS said that the admission cap was a "half-hearted" attempt to "deflect understandable criticism that publicly funded schools should not be religiously segregated and discriminating", but that abolishing the cap would be a "misguided retrograde step".

Just last year the NSS received assurances for Lord Nash, the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Schools, that the Government had "no plans to review the 50% limit for faith-based admissions to free schools", describing the cap as "an important way of supporting these schools to be inclusive and to meet the needs of a broad mix of families".

The Government now claims that allowing more discrimination in faith school admissions would make "faith schools of all kinds do more to make sure their pupils integrate with children of other backgrounds."

Only the "most naïve" would believe this, the NSS said, adding that the change would have "the opposite effect."

The Government should instead act to "remove all religious discrimination in admissions to publicly funded schools", the NSS wrote.

NSS campaigns director Stephen Evans commented: "Separating school children on the basis of their parents' faith is no way of building a cohesive society or preparing young people for life in modern Britain.

"In the long-term the only real solution is to have a secular and inclusive education system which isn't organised around the religious beliefs of parents. In the meantime, the Government should resist any regressive demands to allow faith schools to select even more pupils on the basis of their parents' religious beliefs and activities.

"These deeply troubling proposals come after considerable lobbying efforts from the Catholic Education Service and other faith groups. The pernicious influence of religious groups over education policy is making our education system one of the last bastions of religious discrimination. The Government should be looking to end discrimination - not extend it."

The abolition of the admissions cap will particularly benefit Catholic schools. A No 10 source told the BBC that the cap "has prevented new Catholic schools from opening."

The Catholic Education Service welcomed the proposals and said it would enable "thousands of new Catholic school places across the country."

Professor Ted Cantle, an expert in community cohesion and intercultural education, told the NSS he found it "hard to believe that the Government has agreed to drop what is only a minimal commitment to more mixed schools, when we know schools are becoming more segregated. And only last year the Government warned about the dangers of schoolchildren have little or no understanding of others."

Professor Cantle's 2001 report into race riots in Northern England made a number of recommendations for positive policies to tackle a "depth of polarisation" around segregated communities. However this year Professor Cantle has warned that Britain remains and is increasingly divided along ethnic and cultural lines – with "more segregation in schools and more segregation in workplaces" and that faith schools were particularly problematic.

Professor Cantle went on to say: "It is also hard to believe that faith organisations would want- let alone lobby for- this change. This would make them more concerned about their own interests, than that of the wider community.

"If this change is implemented, I hope that the governors for each school will be responsible enough to reject the change out of hand."

Councils ignoring illegal schools because they “don’t want to upset community relations”

News | Tue, 6th Sep 2016

Ofsted chief Sir Michael Wilshaw has warned that local councils and police are continuing to ignore illegal faith schools, undermining efforts to prosecute the operators and protect children's rights.

In an interview with The Times, the outgoing Chief Inspector said that "political correctness" was causing local authority to turn a blind eye to illegal faith schools, particularly in the case of unregistered Islamic schools.

Sir Michael said that the 150 to 160 illegal schools which are already known about are just the "tip of the iceberg". He told The Times that prosecution cases Ofsted is preparing are "very robust" but said local authority inaction was undermining them.

He said local authorities "have to see this as a serious problem, identify where these places are and close them down."

Instead he said that councils' attitudes to Muslim voters was "a bit like the Seventies and Eighties" where "a lot of local authorities didn't confront the Socialist Workers' Party and all those infiltrating schools in those days partly because the councils themselves were made up of some of those people."

Though unregistered schools of other faiths have been identified, illegal Muslim schools were a particular concern.

He said that in one city even the police were not willing to report unregistered schools. He said police in the example he cited "don't see it as a responsibility" to investigate illegal schools.

Ofsted recently published a handbook for "conducting inspections of unregistered schools".

To identify unregistered schools, the guidance states "Ofsted may receive information regarding possible unregistered schools from a variety of sources including, but not limited to, the DfE, parents, local authorities or the police."

But Sir Michael said that some local authorities were actually "getting in the way" of Ofsted's attempts to identify and challenge illegally operating 'schools'.

In the new Ofsted guidance inspectors are given a model warning notice they could give to the operator of an offending 'school' which states: "it is a criminal offence to conduct an unregistered independent educational institution in England."

Anyone found guilty of doing so "is liable on summary conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine".

NSS campaign director Stephen Evans commented: "This is a phenomenon we are seeing time and time again. Local authorities and services ignoring the plight of children and young people due to misplaced concerns over religious and cultural sensitivity.

"Children of all backgrounds should enjoy the right to a decent education. It's time to put an end to the bigotry of low expectations that allows children to languish in illegal faith schools that place them at risk of harm and fail to prepare them for for life in modern Britain.

"Michael Wilshaw has commendably spoken out against illegal schools and tackled the reluctance of public authorities to identify and take action against them. We'll be seeking assurances from Ofsted's new chief inspector that she will continue to pressure local authorities to identify establishments which leave children and their education neglected. Once identified, the DfE must ensure that illegal schools are closed down, those running them prosecuted and the children attending them receive the education they're entitled to."

Problems in identifying premises which are operating as illegal schools have been reported before. In March 2016 MP Naz Shah told Bradford Council that they were in "denial" over unregistered schools. She made the remarks during one of a series of local meeting Sir Michael held in Birmingham, Bradford and Luton, areas of particular concern where significant numbers of children are not accounted for in local school rolls. Sir Michael said Bradford Council were being "naïve" and challenged them over what active information-gathering they had undertaken to find illegal schools.

In addition to his comments to the Times on unregistered schools, Sir Michael said that home schooling was being used "by parents who want to opt out of the state system because they don't want their youngsters exposed to equality issues or sex education." He said the law needed to be more stringent on home education.

Secularism 2016 Conference: Secularism ‘on the frontline of the most important issue of our time’

News | Wed, 7th Sep 2016

The National Secular Society kicked off its 150th anniversary celebrations with a conference on Saturday 3 September covering everything from collective worship in schools to community cohesion in a secular democracy. The conference was an opportunity to reflect on everything the NSS has achieved in 150 years of campaigning, and consider the significant challenges ahead.

One of our most important successes in recent years, and one of the earliest priorities of the NSS from the beginning, was the abolition of the blasphemy law in 2008. In opening the conference – Secularism 2016: 'living better together' – NSS president Terry Sanderson took a moment to note this formidable achievement, but warned of the need to guard against a return to blasphemy laws "through the backdoor".

Though most of our work naturally focuses on the UK, Terry also spoke to the conference about our international work and the exciting news that the NSS has been granted special consultative status with the UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). This status is an acknowledgement of the NSS's important work in promoting freedom, fairness and human rights and will provide the Society with a platform to address the UN Human Rights Council, ECOSOC, and the General Assembly on human rights issues of concern to secularists.

Following Terry's introduction, the conference opened with a concise and fascinating history of the NSS and our founder Charles Bradlaugh from the historian Deborah Lavin. She talked about the priorities of the NSS as a young organisation, and the raucous public meetings of its local branches.

The first panel of the morning was on secularism and human rights, and our executive director Keith Porteous Wood was very pleased to be joined on stage by the Turkish opposition MP Safak Pavey, and Tehmina Kazi, formerly of British Muslims for Secular Democracy.

Tehmina spoke powerfully against using the law to stymie freedom of expression and the toleration by some universities of gender segregation. She said this was never acceptable. In a varied and informative speech, she turned next to the situation of LGBT Muslims, speaking about the "ostracism" they could face from their communities and the cases where some are forced into marriages.

Safak Pavey spoke next, describing her home country Turkey as "the only example of a secular Islamic society". But she said in recent times that "God's role in politics" had been "rekindled". Secularism was essential in promoting human rights, she added, noting that the cultural cliff opened by "political religion" was "deeper than ever".

Following Safak and Tehmina, Keith gave a wide-ranging address on the issues that confront secularists and the NSS today, including entrenched religious privilege in our institutions, while the Church of England "is becoming less and less representative of the country". While the Church was in long-term decline, he stressed that the established church must not be replaced with a multi-faith model, as some have advocated. Special status for religion in our society does not apply only to Christianity, and he noted with alarm the worrying growth of sharia and the feeble reaction to this phenomenon from figures and groups as varied as the Law Society and the former Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams.

We were fortunate to be joined on the day by several secularist Muslims speakers. Keith said in his speech that "too few" people have the courage to speak out against sharia and that he took care never to refer to it as 'law'.

Our keynote speaker Jacques Berlinerblau gave a challenging and thought-provoking speech, urging the secularist movement in the United States and Europe to pick its battles carefully. He invoked President Kennedy, and played a short clip of the president saying "I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute".

Secularism is often misrepresented, Berlinerblau said, by those who paint it as anti-religious or inimical to religious freedom. Separating church and state is not comparable to state atheist regimes such as the Soviet Union, and Berlinerblau stressed the need to address misconceptions (and deliberate misrepresentations) about what secularism means.

His speech was a fascinating tour through the history of secularism, from Bradlaugh to burkinis, before heading over the pond again to America where he went from Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptists to the modern Democratic Party's ambivalence towards political secularism.

What models of secularism are there around the world today? In a fascinating discussion he explored American versus French secularism, and asked whether India had anything that might be considered 'secularist'.

He reminded the audience that religious minorities have often been great proponents of a secular state – a case the National Secular Society increasingly makes as Christianity is consistently found to be a minority religion (compared to the non-religious majority).

One of the most powerful audience questions came from a Somali secularist who said she had a "target on my back." Berlinerblau said that secular Muslims he knew were "besieged" by death threats and that the genuine moderates were "terrified" to express their views. "When can we get support from the other communities?" the Somali campaigner asked.

After midday many highlights of the conference came from the education panel. NSS campaigns director Stephen Evans talked about one of the aspects of the Society's work which takes up much of our time – helping parents who find religion imposed on their children at school. Stephen highlighted one recent example where we assisted a Muslim family whose child had been assigned to an Orthodox Jewish school. In a school system including over 7,000 faith-based schools, such absurdities are inevitable and much of our time is spent helping parents, pupils and teachers who confront every day the effects of our antiquated settlement on religion's place in the education system.

While there are many successes to celebrate from 150 years of campaigning, there is much work left to do. Nowhere was this made clearer than in the education panel. The archaic requirement for collective worship – against which there has emerged a formidable consensus – was the most striking example of where change and wholesale reform was needed. Little had changed in that area since 1944, putting teachers in the difficult position of ignoring a law they know to be wrong, and in many cases think to be immoral.

Stephen noted that our concerns about children being left to languish in illegal faith schools were finally being taken seriously, but through a security perspective, rather than through the prism of the child's right to an education, which should be the priority.

We were joined on the education panel by Paul Rowe of Educate Together, the group we named Secularist of the Year 2016. The education group opens schools based on the principle of inclusion and equality of esteem for all pupils regardless of their religious background or lack of one. Their schools have proven to be wildly popular in Ireland and have recently spread to the UK. Paul said that in the week running up to the conference alone Educate Together had opened nine new schools. Educate Together models the type of education and admissions policies we would like to see rolled-out nationally across our entire state education system. It was inspiring to hear again about secular education in practice.

The last panel of the day was on the vitally important topic of Islam in a secular democracy. There was a great deal of excitement about hearing our speakers on this topic – Raheel Raza, Douglas Murray and Maajid Nawaz.

Raheel's presentation began with a hard-hitting video from the Clarion Project on levels of support for theocratic principles and terrorism among Muslims around the world, before taking the floor to say that reform within Islam could only come if there was separation between state and religion. She spoke about the important work of the Muslim Reform Movement.

Maajid Nawaz opened by describing his move away from radical Islamism to secularism, and said he was proud to be an honorary associate of the National Secular Society and that Muslims had to speak out in favour of secularism. He said that "Islamism must be intellectually terminated" and blasted the regressive left for defending Islamism and theocracy in the naïve belief that they are defending freedom of religion. As Raheel discussed, Maajid also said that "secularism is the prerequisite to the liberalisation of attitudes in Muslim societies".

Our final guest speaker was Douglas Murray, who thanked those who spoke out against Islamism, despite the risks to their safety, including Richard Dawkins, Peter Tatchell and Raheel Raza. He said that the West was "stumbling" through a struggle with Islamism that nobody had predicted, but that now, decades after the fatwa against Salman Rushdie, European publics had drawn totally different conclusions about Islam than European elites.

Returning to the topic of sharia, he said it was "certainly unhelpful" for the Government to appoint imams to the inquiry into sharia law – a concern the NSS and many other organisations have raised directly with the Government.

Douglas concluded by saying that the National Secular Society was on the frontline of the most important issue of our time.

After the conference was over we heard speeches at our celebratory gala dinner from all of our living former presidents. Barbara Smoker, Denis Cobell, David Tribe, and our current president Terry Sanderson discussed in their toasts the evolution of the NSS from an atheist campaign group to the strictly secularist organisation that it is today. There was much to celebrate, they said, but many difficult challenges lay ahead in a country that was drastically unlike the Britain of 1866, when the NSS was founded.

NSS accuses Government of showing contempt for Parliament and UK’s international obligations on caste discrimination

News | Mon, 5th Sep 2016

The National Secular Society has criticised the Government for "stalling" on caste discrimination after it announced plans for a consultation "on the issue of caste" despite already being under an obligation to outlaw such discrimination.

David Cameron's coalition Government initially promised a consultation in 2013 which it failed to deliver. Parliament subsequently committed to make caste a protected characteristic (as an aspect of race) under equality law via a clause in the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013

Just last month the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination called on the UK to "invoke Section 9(5)(a) of the Equality Act 2010 without further delay to ensure that caste-based discrimination is explicitly prohibited under law and that victims of this form of discrimination have access to effective remedies".

Following years of delays and obstruction, Keith Porteous Wood, executive director of the National Secular Society, said that a consultation "at this stage is just a further attempt to stall implementing what parliament has instructed the Government to do."

Mr Wood continued: "By launching the consultation rather than taking action to outlaw caste-discrimination, the Government are displaying contempt for Parliament, the UN and our international obligations.

"In launching this consultation the Government are giving the oppressors the opportunity to seek to veto legislation to protect the oppressed. We invite the Prime Minister to consider how this approach to equality and Human Rights matches up to her commitment on taking office: 'For me, equality is about fairness. It is simply wrong for anyone to face discrimination or abuse because of who they are.'"

The Government Equalities Office said: "The government is to undertake a full public consultation on the issue of caste and the Equality Act 2010.

"A key aim of the consultation will be to obtain the views of the public on whether additional measures are needed to ensure victims of caste discrimination have appropriate legal protection and effective remedies under the 2010 Equality Act.

"Before taking any decisions, the Government will carefully consider the responses to the consultation, which will run for 12 weeks from its commencement date."

Victims of caste discrimination must currently rely on what Mr Wood described as "ambiguous and untested case law".

In July 2016, shortly before Theresa May took office, the National Secular Society urged the new Government to honour the will of parliament and the UK's international obligations by explicitly outlawing caste-based discrimination.

There is cross-party support for legislation to outlaw caste-based discrimination in the House of Lords.

During a debate on 11 July the Conservative peer Lord Deben told the House: "This is the first chance that a new Government have got to stand up and tell this House that they intend to obey the law. The only alternative is to tell this House that they intend to disobey the law. I do not believe that is a proper position for any Government."

Sharia divorce better than murdering unwanted wives, says Indian Muslim Law Board

News | Fri, 9th Sep 2016

A group campaigning for gender equality in India has called on the country's Supreme Court to end Muslim Personal Law to protect women from "fundamentalists" operating sharia courts, as defenders of sharia say it is better than burning unwanted wives alive.

In an affidavit to the Supreme Court, which has received several prior petitions against the practice of triple talaq, under which a man can unilaterally divorce his wife, the Muslim Women's Quest for Equality said that sharia "should be abolished to save the country and Indian Muslims from … fundamentalists".

Reuters reported that in some case of triple talaq women have been arbitrarily divorced via postcard or telegram.

The group also called for wholesale reform in education and "a complete change" in the madrassa education system and reforms to ensure "worldly education" for Indian Muslims.

"Some people and NGOs are misusing the freedom given by the constitution. They want to keep Muslim education in Muslim extremist's hands, entirely free from the government control."

Clerics were leaving Muslims unsure about whether the country or their religion came first, the affidavit said.

But advocates for Muslim Personal Law in India said that the existing practice should remain and unilateral divorce should be the right of men, and not women, because husbands were less likely to become 'emotional.' The All India Muslim Personal Law Board told the Indian Supreme Court that sharia divorce was best left in place because it was better than "criminal ways of getting rid of [an unwanted wife] by murdering her" or burning her alive.

The Board, which is responsible for overseeing Muslim Personal Law in India, said that religious 'rights' couldn't be questioned by secular courts and that "Courts can't supplant" religious law from the Quran.

The Muslim Women's group called for the Muslim Personal Law Board to be abolished.

Under the Sharia Application Act 1937 matters including divorce, marriage and inheritance between Muslims can be settled in sharia courts under Muslim Personal Law.

But in 2014 the Supreme Court ruled that fatwas issued by sharia courts are not legally binding. The Court also found that no sharia court can issue a fatwa "touching upon the rights, status and obligation of an individual unless such an individual has asked for it."

"The decision or the fatwa issued by whatever body being not emanating from any judicial system recognised by law, it is not binding on anyone including the person, who had asked for it."

NSS Speaks Out

We were quoted by Conatus News on caste discrimination, and the news website also interviewed our president Terry Sanderson.