Newsline 31 July 2015

Newsline 31 July 2015

If you aren't a member already please consider joining the NSS today to help support our campaign work, which is entirely funded by our members' and supporters' contributions. Read on to see all of our news (and more) from the past week.

News, Blogs & Opinion

Prosecution of anti-Islam preacher is “in the public interest”, claims Public Prosecution Service

News | Fri, 31st Jul 2015

The Public Prosecution Service (PPS) of Northern Ireland have defended their prosecution of James McConnell, the Christian preacher who called Islam "Satanic."

In a letter sent to the National Secular Society, the PPS have doubled-down on their decision to take the case to trial, after the NSS warned that their actions had created a "chilling effect" on free speech. A Christian organisation warned that "many churches will be wary of what they place on the internet until this case is heard and the law is clarified."

Pastor McConnell is being prosecuted under the Communications Act 2003 for sending a "grossly offensive" message. The Pastor said during a sermon that Islam was a "doctrine spawned in hell" and that while there "may be" "good Muslims" in the UK, he didn't trust Muslims generally.

In response to a letter of concern written by the National Secular Society urging the PPS to reconsider its course of action, the Prosecution Service have claimed that their controversial decision is in the "public interest", and have vowed to press on despite a raft of criticism from Christian groups, the National Secular Society and an imam, Dr Muhammad Al-Hussaini, who said he strongly upholds "the moral right of Pastor McConnell and myself, as Christian and Muslim, to disagree about matters of doctrine and belief."

However the Prosecution Service stated that "very careful consideration of all the available evidence including the content of the entire sermon" had been undertaken, and that they were "fully cognisant of the defendant's rights."

The PPS added in their response to the National Secular Society that they had "balanced the relevant public interest considerations" in their treatment of the case, but that due to the "gravity" of the preacher's sermon and the "circumstances of the offence and the offender" they were right to "deal with the matter by way of an informed warning."

Pastor McConnell rejected this warning, which would have remained on his criminal record for 12 months, and this led to the case proceeding to trial at the PPS's insistence.

Extraordinarily, the complaint about McConnell's sermon reportedly came from Dr Raied Al-Wazzan, who recently praised the Islamic State and said that Mosul had "become the most peaceful city in the world" under IS rule. "You can go from east to west of the city without fear," he claimed.

Al-Wazzan is now described as the "main prosecution witness" in the case against McConnell.

There has been widespread condemnation of the PPS's actions, but Assistant Director Michael Agnew wrote that he remained of the view that "the evidence Test for Prosecution is met" and that a prosecution was justified given that McConnell has refused to accept the warning.

NSS campaigns manager Stephen Evans said: "This baffling decision to persist with the prosecution of Pastor McConnell represents a reckless and grievous encroachment upon his - and everybody else's - fundamental right to free expression.

"In our view Pastor McConnell was well within his rights to refuse a warning that would have remained on his criminal record for a year, particularly given that he clearly did not incite violence in his sermon and the PPS do not even appear to claim that he did. Given that, the PPS's behaviour seems even more extraordinary.

"Whatever the outcome of this case, the actions of the Public Prosecution Service are likely to have a chilling effect on everyone's freedom to speak openly about their beliefs.

"In an open and free society, we should all feel able to express our beliefs and opinions without fear of criminal sanction - regardless of how unpalatable others may find them.

"The weapon of 'offense' is increasingly being used to stifle free expression. The desire to live in a harmonious and tolerant society is a noble one, but will not be achieved by the suppression of fundamental freedoms.

"We again urge the PPS to drop this case and issue a full apology to Mr. McConnell."

NSS calls for new inspection of Islamic school that bans “socialising with outsiders”

News | Mon, 27th Jul 2015

The National Secular Society has written to the Department for Education and Ofsted calling for a fresh inspection of an Islamic school where pupils are reportedly banned from socialising with "outsiders".

Sky News reported on 25 July that the Tablighi Jamaat Islamic Institute of Education in Dewsbury threatens students with expulsion if they socialise with non-Muslims, and that boarders are banned from using televisions and cameras, as well as music players, mobile phones and other "items that are prohibited in Islam".

Pupils must wear strict Islamic dress and receive no formal sex education at the independent faith school.

However despite this, the last inspection by Ofsted in 2011 rated the school as "good".

Ofsted praised the school for the "excellent tracking and assessment system in place" for lessons on the memorisation of the Quran. The inspection report said that "Qur'anic memorisation [is] outstanding."

The 2011 inspection found that "students have an excellent understanding of their own Muslim culture" but have "no first-hand experiences" at all to "extend their empathy with differing cultural groups in society both at home and overseas."

The school says it aims to "create competent native Islamic scholars."

The Ofsted report recommended that the school develop "links with other schools to provide students with opportunities to socialise and learn with their peers in different environments", which is in stark contrast to the rules uncovered by Sky News which prohibit social interactions with non-Muslims.

Since 2014, independent schools have been required to "actively promote" the fundamental values "of democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs."

The National Secular Society has written to the Department for Education and Ofsted calling for an inspection to take place under the new rules as a matter of urgency.

Stephen Evans, National Secular Society campaigns manager, said: "The most recent inspection of the Tablighi Jamaat Islamic Institute of Education predates the revision of the regulations, but we believe there are serious doubts as to whether the school sufficiently met the standards in operation at the time of its previous inspection.

"A fresh inspection is therefore necessary to ensure that the school is meeting the New Independent School Standards and adequately preparing its students for life in modern Britain.

"It is important that throughout all aspects of education there is an emphasis on the basic values that underpin a free, equal and progressive society. No establishment found to be involved in promoting ideas that are counter-cohesive, separatist and contrary to the values outlined in the standards should be permitted to operate as registered school."

The National Secular Society responded to a Government consultation on the new standards for independent schools in August 2014, and warned at the time that any attempt to tackle extremism in schools would be "undermined by an education system that encourages faith based schools and allows children … to be separated according to the religious beliefs of their parents."

The new guidance states that "pupils must be encouraged to regard people of all faiths, races and cultures with respect and tolerance".

The Prime Minister recently made a significant speech on tackling extremism in which he said that "it cannot be right" that "people can grow up and go to school and hardly ever come into meaningful contact with people from other backgrounds and faiths."

While the NSS welcomed much of his speech, his refusal to tackle faith schools ignored a key factor which drives ethnic and social segregation in the UK today.

David Cameron added that "you don't have to support violence to subscribe to certain intolerant ideas which create a climate in which extremists can flourish."

Mr Evans added, "The insular nature of the Institute of Islamic Education and its prohibition on socialising with non-Muslims sounds like a case study in what the Prime Minister warned about. We hope a new investigation is carried out as soon as possible."

Christians shouldn’t put self-interest above Britain’s need to better integrate

Opinion | Fri, 31st Jul 2015

The long history of Christian involvement in state education shouldn't stand in the way of a more integrated education system, argues Stephen Evans.

No sooner had David Cameron finished delivering his landmark speech on extremism which stressed the need for British citizens to better integrate, the Catholic Education Service set to work on a press release arguing that the PM was wrong on integration and setting out why it should continue to be allowed to use public money to religiously segregate children.

The part of the Prime Minister's speech that really seems to have upset them was where he suggested that dividing children by their parents' religion and bussing them to different areas might not the right approach for Britain.

This is a particularly sensitive topic for Catholics. For many years Catholic parents have taken advantage of local authorities' generous subsidising of the transport costs when they've opted to send their child to a more distant religious school rather than their catchment school closer to home.

In recent years, a number of local authorities have decided to cut this discretionary (not to mention discriminatory) expenditure, opting instead to only provide transport to pupils' nearest available school. It would be nice to think this was because they realised it was wrong in principle to treat religious families favourably and subsidise religious segregation, but in reality, it's because their budgets have been slashed and they have to make savings wherever they can.

Catholic schools are some of the most socially selective schools in the country - bastions of discrimination - selecting their pupils of the basis of their parents' religious beliefs and activities and teachers on the basis of their "personal conviction and practice of the faith". Do you really need to be "witnesses in word and deed to the Divine Teacher, Jesus Christ" in order to teach Maths, as this Memorandum on the appointment of teachers in Catholic Schools suggests?

The Catholic Church is even refusing to open free schools because the 50 per cent limit on school places they can allocate on the basis of faith wouldn't enable them to keep the non-Catholics out.

They will claim, sometimes with justification, that due to the cultural diversity of Catholics in some areas, Catholic schools are vibrant mix children of various ethnic, social and economic backgrounds.

But that doesn't alter the fact that, as a country, Britain needs to move away from religiously segregated schooling.

We live in an age of equality. If Catholics have their own state funded schools, every other religious group will have to have their own state funded schools, leading to a horribly balkanised school system. Children from Anglican, Muslim (Sunni and Shia?), Hindu, Jewish and Sikh, backgrounds, separated and educated in accordance to the teachings of 'their' religion. What could possibly go wrong?

Unsurprisingly, the public mood in Northern Ireland, where it did go wrong, is for an end to segregated schools. That's because after years of conflict they've realised the importance of breaking down barriers and allowing children to live, learn and play together from an early age.

In his speech, David Cameron said: "It cannot be right that people can grow up and go to school and hardly ever come into meaningful contact with people from other backgrounds and faiths."

He is absolutely right, and in time perhaps he may even find it within himself to call into question the whole concept of faith schooling. Instead, he says he's"the first to support the great education they provide". "I chose one for my own children" he added.

But if he really wants schools to be truly inclusive and based on "British values" of democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs - he might have to accept that they shouldn't also be based around religious doctrine.

Perhaps David Cameron thinks its fine for his fluffy Anglicanism to be drummed into Britain's youngsters, but doesn't care so much for some of the more orthodox stuff.

The Prime Minister recently insisted Britain was a 'Christian country'. But the privileging of Christianity - so incongruously prevalent in today's society - makes demands for the privileging of other religions much harder to resist.

Parents of all religious persuasions may regard the passing on their particular faith and religious values to their children as vitally important, but this should be regarded as a parental role, not the role of the state.

According to Pope Benedict XVI, the primary mission of Catholic educational institutions is to allow students to "encounter the living God who in Jesus Christ reveals his transforming love and truth". But the state should concern itself with education in the more traditionally understood sense of the word - and ensuring that children are properly equipped for life as citizens in modern Britain.

Both the Anglican and Catholic Churches have long been able to use publicly funded schools to inculcate children into their religious traditions. Their reluctance to let go of that privilege is understandable. But for the sake of young people's future, people of all faiths should accept that faith-based education isn't in Britain's best interest.

Let's educate our children together.

This blog was originally posted on the Huffington Post.

Concerns after protests force closure of abortion clinic

News | Fri, 24th Jul 2015

The National Secular Society has joined others in expressing concern after an abortion clinic was apparently forced to close after "intimidating protests."

In an open letter to Jeremy Hunt, campaigners, including a number of MPs, have called on the Secretary of State for Health to outline the steps being taken by the Government to support those providing and accessing abortion services.

On 21 July the Times reported that "intimidating protests" were to blame for seeing the clinic close, which is thought to be a first in Britain.

The letter to the Health Secretary states:

"It is not acceptable for any part of our National Health Service to be held hostage by a small number of protesters who are preventing women accessing, or getting information about, services.

"We believe that the NHS should be able to ensure that staff can work free from harassment, that patients can access services, and that no appointments are cancelled, or clinics closed, as a result of such disruptive actions."

The letter notes that within the 1967 Abortion Act it is "surely the Government's responsibility" to "ensure that there is provision for access to safe, legal abortions for women regardless of where they live."

NSS president Terry Sanderson commented: "These disgraceful tactics have been imported from America where the anti-abortion movement has become fanatical and lethal.

"If these people feel this strongly about abortion, they should make their case through the lobbying channels that we all have to use.

Mr Sanderson called the harassment of women going to abortion clinics "shameful".

"The Government must ensure that staff can work free from harassment, and that patients can access services without intimidation" he added.

The closure of the centre has prompted renewed calls for "buffer zones" around abortion clinics so that protesters are excluded from the immediate vicinity of the centres.

The British Pregnancy Advisory Service has said "desperate attempts" are being made to prevent access to services.

Nepalese Christians defend secularism, amid fears of persecution

News | Thu, 30th Jul 2015

Christian Solidarity Worldwide (CSW) has warned that dropping explicit reference to secularism from Nepal's constitution could leave Christians at risk of persecution.

Nepal was established as a secular democracy relatively recently, after long-running internal conflicts, but now Christian campaigners fear that they may face religious persecution after a government survey found widespread support for the description of Nepal as a 'Hindu' state in the nation's constitution, rather than describing the country as a 'secular' republic.

Premier Christian Radio reports that the CSW fear the change in the constitution "to make Nepal solely a Hindu state could pave the way for more persecution against Christians and other minorities in the country."

Kiri Kankhwende of CSW told Premier Christian Radio that "the state must remain neutral on religious matters, ensuring no religion or belief receives preferential treatment, while also upholding rule of law."

He added that "the rights of all citizens to discuss and share their beliefs and opinions with others who may not hold the same beliefs, as guaranteed by Article 19 of the ICCPR, must also be upheld."

"With reference to the new constitution of Nepal, if the word 'secular' is omitted from the constitution, then there needs to be another way of expressing the state's 'neutrality' towards all religions," Mr Kankhwende said.

Christian Solidarity Worldwide have praised the secular model for bridging divisions between religious groups and for maintaining the current "independence of government from any one religion."

An NSS spokesperson commented: "We hope that the Nepalese government defends freedom of and from religion, including the freedom to leave or change your faith, or to have no religious beliefs whatsoever.

"It would be a great shame if the constitution does drop the term 'secularism' in favour of a religious description of Nepal as a 'Hindu country'. It is extremely problematic to describe any nation, no matter how religiously homogeneous, in terms of a religious faith. That argument applies to Nepal and the UK alike.

"Secularism defends the rights of the religious and non-religious alike, and protects religious minorities from state-backed discrimination."

CSW say they are advocating for a constitution in Nepal that would "guarantee every person the right to choose or change their religion or belief, and to communicate it to others, which draft proposals would endanger. There is also a need to safeguard harmonious coexistence between people of the many different faiths which exist in Nepal."

The group is also concerned that draft constitutional proposals may prohibit religious conversion. The CSW report that one proposal would criminalise converting "another person from one religion to another," language they have criticised.

NSS Speaks Out

NSS executive director Keith Porteous Wood was interviewed by Sky News on the Islamic faith school which bans students from socialising with 'outsiders'. Our campaign work for an inclusive education system was described as a "plot"(!) by the Catholic Herald – not that we've ever made a secret of our opposition to faith-based schools.

The Telegraph noted our concern about the recent closure of an abortion clinic as the result of anti-abortion protests. NSS president Terry Sanderson joined other campaigners in raising the alarm.

NSS campaigns manager Stephen Evans was interviewed by BBC Spotlight and BBC Radio Solent on Lyme Regis council's decision to hold prayers during their formal meetings. Our criticism of the decision was also reported on the BBC website and picked up by the local media.

The Christian Institute again cited our concerns about the free speech implications of 'extremism disruption orders', and our serious objection to the prosecution of Pastor McConnell was referred to in the Belfast Newsletter.

Finally Breitbart London quoted us on research about the prevalence of extremist speakers on university campuses in the UK.