Newsline 24 May 2013

Newsline 24 May 2013

Becoming a member of the National Secular Society is a declaration of your support for the separation of the state from religious institutions. Make a stand for freedom, fairness and human rights by adding your voice to the call for a secular society. Join today.

Read this week's Newsline in full (PDF)

News, Blogs & Opinion

NSS condemns Flintshire Council's 'discriminatory' transport policy

News | Wed, 22nd May 2013

The National Secular Society has criticised a decision by Flintshire Council to discriminate against people without religious faith in its school transport arrangements.

Flintshire Council's cabinet voted on Tuesday to scrap free transport for pupils attending faith schools. However, under the controversial new policy, children who can prove their beliefs with such evidence as baptism certificates will be exempt from the cuts.

The Council has said that withdrawing the discretionary funding could save up to £100,000 a year.

The authority is one of the first in the UK to impose charges for transporting children who cannot prove they share the faith of the school.

A consultation on the proposals received 638 responses, with 542 (85%) strongly disagreeing with the Council's plans.

Stephen Evans, National Secular Society campaigns manager, said: "There is something morally repugnant about a policy that uses the religious beliefs of parents to single out specific children for discrimination in this way.

"Flintshire Council are callously exploiting exemptions to equality legislation that enables faith schools to operate with impunity.

"Their policy decision could result in children who live next door to each other, and travel to the same state funded school being treated unequally, purely on the basis of their parent's religious beliefs. Such discrimination should have no place in modern society.

"The Government must call an end to this discrimination by compelling local authorities to have equitable school transport policies, free from religious privilege, and fair to all families."

Statistics show massive loss of interest in Catholicism in England and Wales

News | Mon, 20th May 2013

Following the bad news for Christian leaders generally from the census figures, new research by the Latin Mass Society illustrates a catastrophic decline in Catholicism in Britain.

The statistics show that the 1960s were peak for Catholic baptisms (138,000) and marriages (47,000) and these have dropped to 64,000 and 10,000 respectively. Most of the figures in the study go back as far as 1913, giving an overarching view of the state of the Catholic Church in England and Wales over a century.

Receptions into the Church (adult conversions) peaked in 1959 at 16,000 but since 1997 have been below 6,000.

The ordination of new priests has shown the most dramatic fall, to only a sixteenth of the 1965 figure.

Dr Joseph Shaw, chairman of the Latin Mass Society, who led the research, said the figures "show unambiguously that something went seriously wrong in the Church in England and Wales in the 1960s and 1970s. Catholics ceased quite suddenly to see the value of getting married, having large families, and having their children baptised. Non-Catholics no longer perceived the Church as the ark of salvation, and ceased to seek admission. Young men no longer offered themselves for the priesthood in the same numbers as before."

The number of priests in England and Wales rose steadily from 3,838 in 1912 to a peak of 7,887 in 1965, before beginning to tail off. It recovered for a while in the mid-1990s, but fell to 5,264 in 2011. "In this respect we are still living on our capital, and this capital is about to run out," he said.

In 1965 there were 233 ordinations but since then there has been a steady fall, reaching double figures by 1981. The lowest point was reached in 2009, with only 14 ordinations. 2010 showed a marked improvement, with 23, only to drop again to 16 in 2011.

Other statistics released show an increase in men becoming monks and women becoming nuns, but from a very low base. In 2012, 30 men joined priestly orders, a rise from 19 in each of the three previous years, and the most since 1996. There has also been a significant rise in women joining active orders, from six in 2009 to 23 in 2012.

Because the number of Catholics in England and Wales has increased (mainly due to immigration), the number of priests per 100,000 Catholics has halved since 1947, from 268 to 135 in 2010.

The estimated number of Catholics in England and Wales has increased from 1.8 million in 1912 (when the population was 36.1 million, or 5% of the population) to just over four million in 2010 (when the population was 56.1 million 7% of the population). The Catholic population has been largely inflated by immigration from Eastern Europe.

Hull council latest to scrap free pupil transport to religious schools

News | Thu, 23rd May 2013

Hull City Council is to cease discretionary funding transport for pupils attending "faith schools" from September 2014. The change will save £339,000 in 2014-15 according to council figures.

Local Education Authorities have a statutory duty to provide free school transport for pupils of school age who live beyond walking distance to their nearest school. The walking distance to school is three miles for children over the age of eight years.

The current policy provided free school transport to pupils significantly beyond the statutory duty, however, as required by law, the council will still give free travel to pupils on low incomes or with special educational needs.

Many local authorities facing major pressure on their budgets are now either cutting (or proposing to cut) free or subsidised transport to faith schools in an attempt to save money. The free school bus policy had not been changed since 1996, according to the council.

Women wake up – your dignity is negotiable

Opinion | Tue, 21st May 2013

This morning I read about a man in Sydney who was accused of rioting last year. Mohammad Issai Issaka, accused of riot, assaulting police, and resisting arrest during the infamous Sydney riots of 2012, refused to stand up in court claiming it was against his religion. He would not stand because the Magistrate was a woman.

In the end, according to the report, a ludicrous "compromise" was reached "whereby Issaka would walk into the courtroom after the Magistrate and leave before her, so he didn't have to technically stand up for her".

I am almost lost for words.

A woman works to achieve the position of Magistrate – a position generally viewed with respect – but she is humiliated and degraded because some misogynist little twerp refuses to acknowledge her authority.

Guess what happens? A "compromise". Not contempt of court as it should have been, but a tacit approval of his "beliefs" - regardless of how humiliating it may be for the Magistrate - and a lesson to all women; no matter who you are or what you achieve, you're still just a woman and if a man doesn't want to recognise your authority, well that is his prerogative and it will be respected.

This is not the first time.

In Italy, a 5-star hotel in Venice also reached a "compromise" when a Muslim employee refused to take orders from the female boss. Instead of being fired as he should have been, the hotel hired a man to take orders from the female boss and relay them to the employee. The woman's dignity went out the window.

In Spain, female parking metre enforcement officers were withdrawn from an area in Palma de Mallorca following harassment from members of a local mosque who insisted that only men should work there. The women were moved on and replaced with an exclusively male team.

Sharia law is thriving in Britain– and elsewhere – even though it treats women as property (property with beating rights afforded to owners). FGM goes on with such impunity in the UK that people are even coming here from other European countries to have it performed under the nose of our authorities; knowing full well it will go unpunished because it is their 'culture'.

The lesson? When there is a clash between the rights and dignity of women and religious or cultural sensitivities, women lose – every single time.

It is time to wake up. This will only get worse if we don't.

Report into experiences of female converts to Islam

News | Thu, 23rd May 2013

A ground-breaking report examining the experiences of nearly 50 British women of all ages, ethnicities, backgrounds and faiths (or no faith) – who have all converted to Islam - was launched in London yesterday by the University of Cambridge.

The report, produced by the University's Centre of Islamic Studies (CIS), in association with the New Muslims Project, Markfield, is a fascinating dissection of the conversion experience of women in Britain in the 21st Century.

The first forum of its kind held in the UK, the study concludes with a series of recommendations for the convert, heritage Muslim, and wider British communities. The 129-page report also outlines the social, emotional and sometimes economic costs of conversion, and the context and reasons for women converting to Islam in a society with pervasive negative stereotypes about the faith.

Project Leader and Director of CIS, Yasir Suleiman, said: "The consistent themes flowing through the report is the need for increased levels of support for the convert community – and the converts' own potential to be a powerful and transformative influence on both the heritage Muslim community and wider British society.

"Another of the recurring themes was the overwhelmingly negative portrayal of Muslims and Islam in the UK media and what role the convert community might have to play in helping to redress the balance.

This report seeks to dispel misapprehensions and misrepresentations of female converts to Islam."

A key revelation of the study was the heavily disproportionate attention, bordering on obsession in some cases, given to white, female converts to Islam by both the Muslim and non-Muslim communities alike.

This is often to the detriment of African-Caribbean converts, thought to be the largest ethnic group of converts to Islam, who are often ignored and left feeling isolated by both the Muslim and non-Muslim communities.

Added Suleiman: "White converts can be regarded as 'trophy' Muslims and used in a tokenistic fashion by various sections of society, including the media. African-Caribbean converts remain largely invisible, uncelebrated and frequently unacknowledged. They can feel like a minority within a minority and this is something that must be addressed. I found this part of the conversion narratives hardest to bear."

New "safe campus" website - radical silence on religious radicalism?

Opinion | Wed, 22nd May 2013

A new website, Safe Campus Communities, aimed at helping universities handle radicalisation and extremism on campuses was launched at a Universities UK conference in London this week.

The website, which has been welcomed by the Minister for Universities and Science, David Willetts, has been described as providing those involved in higher education with "a range of information to help them with issues including external speaker protocols, effective community and police engagement, and inter-faith relations on campus."

Commenting on the new site, Nicola Dandridge, Chief Executive of Universities UK - which runs the site - said: "This new website creates an invaluable resource for universities. It will enable them to share information as to how they have addressed the challenge of ensuring that their campuses are open, while also providing a safe environment for all staff, students and visitors.

The website's launch follows a report by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Homeland Security, published in April 2011, which described campus extremism as a "serious problem". The report advised the government to "finally tackle the serious problem of radicalisation on university campuses with utmost urgency".

The "utmost urgency" advised is understandable; extremism within the university arena, particularly in its religious form, is a well-documented phenomenon, and an increasingly terrifying one.

Student Rights, a group dedicated to tackling extremism on campus, has highlighted the many forms through which religious extremism is being inculcated on campuses. A report compiled by the group, along with the Henry Jackson Society, shows the ways in which student societies, particularly Islamic ones, distribute information on, and links to, extremist lectures and information. Its research shows how Islamic Societies encourage the ideology of groups such as Hizb ut-Tahrir, and invite external speakers who promote ideas of a Western war against Islam, support for paramilitary violence in Israel, encourage intolerance of non-believers and obligate Islam as a political system for law and governance.

It is within this context that the insidious practice of gender segregation has also become an increasingly common issue on campuses, with 180 events in the period March 2012 to March 2013 being investigated for evidence of segregation.

Of course, there have also been a number of well-known cases linking terrorist activity to universities; one of the most high-profile of which was the former University College London student Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab who attempted to blow up a plane flying to the United States on Christmas Day in 2009.

Despite these recent cases of religious extremism on campuses however, the press release about the launch of the new website made no mention of religious extremism as something to combat specifically. Instead, it contained only a vague phrase about "inter-faith relations". That is not to say that a press release about a new website seeking to tackle extremism on campus is the appropriate forum in which to highlight the many dimensions of religious extremism. Rather, the point is, through its use of opaque language and absence of any reference to religion, Safe Campus Communities gives the worrying impression it is reluctant to confront one of the core elements of extremism in universities: that is, religious extremism.

Any group serious about promoting the equality, safety and freedom of students, needs to have the courage to acknowledge publicly the central role that religious extremism plays. It needs to acknowledge the central role religious extremism plays in marginalising and manipulating the vulnerable. It needs to acknowledge the central role religious extremism plays in consistently undermining women's rights and intimidating women on campus. And it needs to acknowledge the central role religious extremism plays in helping develop a generation of segregated, radicalised and, potentially, very dangerous individuals.

Attempts to protect women’s rights in Afghanistan have been blocked by clerics in the parliament

News | Tue, 21st May 2013

The new laws proposed a minimum marriage age for girls, and women not being prosecuted for rapes committed against them.

Khalil Ahmad Shaheedzada, a conservative lawmaker for the Herat province, said parliament withdrew the legislation because of opposition from religious parties that considered the law un-Islamic. "Whatever is against Islamic law, we don't even need to speak about it," Shaheedzada said.

Using executive authority, President Hamid Karzai had created the Law on Elimination of Violence Against Women in 2009. But this needed to be ratified by parliament.

The law would have criminalised domestic violence and protected victims from themselves facing criminal charges after men had raped them. It would also have banned "baad," which allows for the commercial exchange of women to settle disputes.

Religious representatives objected to more than half a dozen parts of the legislation, including a minimum marriage age of 16 for girls and supporting shelters for women whose husbands had abused them.

Shaheedzada claimed that the law might encourage promiscuity and reflected values not applicable in Afghanistan.

"Even now in Afghanistan, women are running from their husbands. Girls are running from home," Shaheedzada said. "Such laws give them these ideas."

Fawzia Kofi, a lawmaker and women's rights activist (recently honoured by Newsweek's online publication The Daily Beast as one of the "150 Women Who Shake the World"), brought the legislation up for a vote to prevent a future president from reversing it under pressure from religious groups.

Saying that the law does not represent fundamental tenants of Sharia Law and is only coming from 'the West', some of the most conservative members of the Parliament echoed strong conservative religious policies that are still upheld today by many of Afghanistan's rural tribal community leaders.

"It is wrong that a woman and man cannot marry off their child until she is 16" said Obaidullah Barekzai, a member from southeast Uruzgan province, where female literacy rates are among the lowest in the country.

An Afghan man must be at least 18 years old to marry.

Barekzai argued against all age limits for women, citing historical figure Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq, a close companion of the Prophet Muhammad, who married off his daughter at age seven.

At least eight other legislators, mostly from the Ulema Council, a government-appointed body of clerics, joined him in decrying the law as un-Islamic. Abdul Sattar Khawasi, member for Kapisa province, called women's shelters "morally corrupt". Justice Minister Habibullah Ghaleb last year dismissed them as houses of "prostitution and immorality", provoking fierce condemnation from women's groups.

"Unfortunately, there were some conservative elements who are opposing this law," said Fawzia Kofi, who is running in next year's presidential election. "What I am disappointed at is because there were also women who were opposing this law."

More than 60 women serve in Afghanistan's 352-member bicameral National Assembly, though most do so thanks to constitutional provisions reserving certain seats for women.

Before the arrival of NATO troops twelve years ago, the Taliban had banned women from working and attending school - even leaving home without a male relative - and forced them to wear head-to-toe burqas under penalty of execution for even minor offences.

See also: Number of Afghan women fleeing abuse soars and Surge in number of Afghan women in jail

Tribunal claims of religious discrimination test equality laws

News | Thu, 23rd May 2013

A man described as "white British" has won more than £2,000 compensation from a halal meat firm after he complained of racial and religious discrimination.

Christopher Turton worked with 298 Muslims at the national Halal Food Group, Birmingham, and complained to a tribunal about an "offensive and racist" email. The email described Mr Turton, from Hasbury, as not being a "Muslim brother" and asked if he had been favoured in his appointment because he was white.

The Birmingham Employment Tribunal was told he was one of only two non-Muslim workers, having been employed as an area manager before being promoted to national concessional manager.

The firm supplied goods to supermarkets and other outlets and Mr Turton introduced changes in a move to boost income. But the changes were not wholly welcomed, said Mr Sonny Jagpal, representing the respondents.

Later an email was sent out criticising Mr Turton and alleging Mr Turton had been favoured and asked: "Is it because he is white?"

It also pointed out that Mr Turton was not a brother of Islam and added: "Allah is the provider."

Mr Turton told the tribunal that he found the email "extremely offensive" and was made to feel alienated. He went off work with stress and eventually resigned.

Mr Jagpal said the email had been sent by an employee and a self-employed worker and was totally against the opinion of the firm. "The firm's management disapproved of the email and arranged a face-to-face meeting with those involved and issued an apology," said Mr Jagpal.

In another case, an Essex nursery has been cleared of indirect religious discrimination after a Muslim woman complained that the dress code went against her religious beliefs.

Begum v Pedagogy Auras UK Ltd t/a Barley Lane Montessori Day Nursery in Ilford was accused of putting people observing a particular religion at a disadvantage through its dress code.

Ms Begum is a Muslim, who wears a full-length jilbab which covers her body from her neck to her ankles, and a hijab. She refused a job at a nursery after being told that she would need to wear non-slip footwear for health and safety reasons and that while she could wear a jilbab to work, it could not be of the type that covered her shoes and touched the floor. Various options had been discussed to accommodate a different style of jilbab, but Begum claimed indirect religious discrimination because the nursery had some policies that went against her morals and beliefs.

The tribunal rejected her claim as the Nursery's policy did not contravene the second part of the indirect discrimination test where it would need to be shown that it put Muslim women at a particular disadvantage. There was no group (or indeed individual) disadvantage, since Muslim women would be able to wear a jilbab - whether full length dress or shorter - as long as it did not represent a trip hazard.

Economic crisis forcing Poland to reconsider its ban on ritual slaughter

News | Tue, 21st May 2013

The Polish parliament, which banned ritual slaughter of animals for the halal and kosher markets in January, is now considering revoking the law because of economic pressures.

The export market for ritually slaughtered meat - in which the animal has its throat slit and bleeds to death while conscious - was very lucrative for Poland. It grew between 20 and 30% per year in recent years, with interest from Muslim countries such as Egypt and Indonesia looking for good quality meat.

The kosher and halal business had boomed until January, when the ban took effect following a ruling by the Constitutional Tribunal. Although the actual slaughter was carried out by specially trained Muslim and Jewish officials, the industry also created about 6,000 other jobs.

Animal rights activists argue that killing animals without stunning them first causes unnecessary suffering. Jewish and Muslim leaders strongly disagree, and insist that their method is actually more humane, in part because it causes the animals to lose consciousness very fast. They argue that standard industrial slaughter involves pre-stunning that is sometimes not effective, leading to even greater suffering.

The Prime Minister Donald Tusk is anxious to get the business going again and his government has recently drafted a law that would reinstate religious slaughter while also adding some new protections for animals.

The law's fate now rests with parliament, which is due to debate and vote on it in the coming weeks. The government enjoys majority support in the assembly, so the law is likely to be passed, but not without acrimony.

Witold Choinski, the head of Polish Meat, said the industry is worth about 500 million euros per year to the Polish. About 100,000 tons of kosher or halal beef and 100,000 tons of poultry were exported annually before the ban — making up between 20 and 30% of Poland's beef exports and about 10% of poultry exports.

For now, business is being picked up by producers in nearby countries, including Latvia, Hungary, Bosnia and the Czech Republic, Mufti Tomasz Miskiewicz said.

The debate so far has revolved around animal cruelty and has not featured any anti-Semitic or anti-Muslim sentiment.

Council prayers challenged in the United States

News | Mon, 20th May 2013

The US Supreme Court is to consider whether prayers can be offered as part of government meetings.

The case is being brought by two residents of Greece, New York, who say they feel marginalized by the Christian prayers that open every town board meeting.

The two women – Susan Galloway and Linda Stephens – are being represented by Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a religious liberty watchdog that has long opposed the practice of inviting clergy to open meetings with sectarian prayers.

Town officials claim members of all faiths and atheists are welcome to give the opening prayer, but official records show that two-thirds of the prayers delivered between 1999 and June 2010 contained references to "Jesus Christ", "Your Son", "the Holy Spirit" or "Jesus".

Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United, said: "A town council meeting isn't a church service, and it shouldn't seem like one. The Government can't serve everyone in the community when it endorses one faith over others. That sends the clear message that some are second-class citizens based on what they believe about religion."

American's United Legal Director Ayesha N. Khan, who is expected to argue the case before the Supreme Court this autumn, commented: "Legislative bodies should focus on serving the community and stay out of the business of promoting religion."

After a similar challenge by the National Secular Society in 2011, the High Court in London ruled that prayers as part of formal meetings of a Council were unlawful.

Following the ruling, Communities Secretary Eric Pickles said that the Localism Act, which came into effect after the ruling, enabled councils to continue to include prayers as part of their formal business. However, his claims, which have been questioned by legal professionals, have yet to be tested in court.

It is thought that around half of UK councils known to be opening meetings with prayers before the ruling, have now ended the practice.

Vermont approves doctor-assisted suicide

News | Wed, 22nd May 2013

The Governor of Vermont this week signed into law a new bill legalising doctor-assisted suicide. This makes it the third US state to approve such legislation.

At the same time, a new YouGov poll for the Huffington Post shows that legislation similar to the Vermont measure would be supported by 50% of Americans.

Vermont– a mostly rural state in New England, which has a tradition of liberality and progressive thinking (it was the first to permit same-sex marriage) - follows the states of Oregon and Washington in legalising assisted suicide. It is the first time assisted suicide has been brought in through legislation rather than through voter demand through a referendum.

Under the Vermont law, terminally ill patients who are given no more than six months to live can ask their doctors to prescribe a lethal dose of drugs to hasten their death.

Several safeguards are built into the law. These include a requirement for two medical opinions, the option of a psychiatric examination and a 17-day waiting period before a life-ending prescription can be filled.

A Pew Research Center poll found that 84% of Americans support allowing a terminally ill adult patient to decide if they want to be kept alive.

Read this week's Newsline in full (PDF)

NSS Speaks Out

Terry Sanderson gave an interview to Voice of Russia radio about the new analysis of the census figures. Stephen Evans discussed the figures on BBC Sussex. The NSS was quoted in the Telegraph on the same issue and in The Independent, Eurasia Review Turkish Weekly and the Digital Journal

Keith Porteous Wood was on BBC Midlands radio talking about the secular implications of gay marriage. Terry Sanderson was similarly quoted on the Channel 4 news website.

Scottish spokesperson Alistair McBay had this letter in the Scottish Herald.

Stephen Evans, the NSS campaigns manager, was quoted in the Chester Chronicle about the NSS's objections to children having to prove their religious commitment before getting free transport on the school bus to Flintshire "faith schools". The NSS's objection to separate Scout troops for religious groups was reported in The Andover Advertiser on the news of the formation of a Muslim scout troop in Basingstoke.